nanotechnology, science and applications | Journament

Journal Ranking

#777 / 33,968
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

nanotechnology, science and applications

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name nanotechnology, science and applications
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.dovepress.com/nanotechnology-science-and-applications-journal
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

2018
Hybrid structures based on gold nanoparticles and semiconductor quantum dots for biosensor applications.
Kurochkina, Margarita;Konshina, Elena;Oseev, Aleksandr;Hirsch, Soeren;
Vol. 11 , pp. 15-21
399 views DOI Abstract
2018
soviet and post-soviet models of development of the timber industry complex of russia in the second half of the 20th century: problems, challenges, solutions
;Oleg I. Kulagin;Ilya R. Shegelman
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 140-148
274 views DOI Abstract
2019
Synthesis, characterization, and in vitro evaluation of novel polymer-coated magnetic nanoparticles for controlled delivery of doxorubicin (Nanotechnol Sci Appl., 2012, 5, (13-25))
not, found
Vol. 12 , pp. 1-2
248 views DOI
2017
institutionalization of public policy: analysis of socio-political practices in the regions of the russian federation
;Sergey A. Pankratov;Ekaterina G. Kirsanova;Elena N. Seyfieva
Vol. 22 , No. 6 , pp. 188-192
238 views DOI Abstract
2013
x-ray screening of the artificially deformed skulls from the middle bronze age of the low volga region (paleopathology aspect)
;Pererva Evgenii Vladimirovich
, No. 2 , pp. 7-19
236 views DOI Abstract
2018
demographic consequences of the stalingrad battle
;Evgeniy F. Krinko;Maksim V. Medvedev
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 91-104
223 views DOI Abstract
2017
transformation of social structure of the russian society in 1917
;Darya A. Kalinina
Vol. 22 , No. 6 , pp. 38-45
186 views DOI Abstract
2014
an ancient yakut tradition of avoidance: traditions and ethno-cultural similarities
;Petrova Svetlana
, No. 6 , pp. 66-70
182 views DOI Abstract
2018
bulavin’s letter to achuev’s muhafiz hassan pasha (1708)
;Petr A. Avakov;Dmitriy V. Sen
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 62-70
177 views DOI Abstract
2017
the february revolution of 1917 and land property of the russian monarch: nation-wide dimension and regional factor
;Pavel A. Afanasyev;Evgeniya V. Demchik
Vol. 22 , No. 6 , pp. 77-86
151 views DOI Abstract
View All 12 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
30
50
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.