journal of porous media | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2827 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of porous media

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name journal of porous media
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.begellhouse.com/journals/porous-media.html
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (29 total)

2016
Computational screening of zeolitic materials for CO<inf>2</inf> and H<inf>2</inf>S separation
Lagos F.
Vol. 19 , pp. 367-378
280 views DOI
2015
the development of the scientific aesthetic in archaeological site photography?
;Charlotte Carter
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. -
231 views DOI Abstract
2010
christopher evans 2009. fengate revisited: further fen-edge excavations, bronze age fieldsystems and settlement and the wyman abbot/leeds archives. cambridge landscape archives: historiography and fieldwork (no. 1). cambridge: cambridge archaeological unit.
;Niall Sharples
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 52-54
222 views DOI
2012
sydney b.j. skertchly and the early history of pleistocene archaeology at the queensland museum
;Michael C. Westaway
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 14-18
197 views DOI Abstract
2000
arkansas archaeology. essays in honor of dan and phyllis morse, edited by robert c. mainfort and marvin d. jeter, fayetteville, university of arkansas press, 1999
;Robert C. Dunnell
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 5-7
174 views DOI Abstract
1993
sir gardner wilkinson and his circle, by jason thompson, university of texas press, austin, 1992
;Richard B. Woodbury
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 19-20
168 views DOI Abstract
2001
early scholars' visits to central america: reports by karl sapper, walter lehmann, and franz termer, edited by marilyn beaudry-corbett and ellen t hardy, theodore e gutman, 2000
;Charles C. Kolb
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 18-21
164 views DOI Abstract
2004
thomas c. patterson 2003 marx’s ghost: conversations with archaeologists. oxford and new york: berg publishers.
;David L. Browman
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 35-36
145 views DOI
2002
death in the afternoon: honduras, hemingway, and duncan strong
;Thomas W. Cuddy
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 5-21
140 views DOI Abstract
2006
doctoral dissertations
;Tim Murray
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 46-47
127 views DOI
View All 29 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
50
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.