boucher de perthes and the discovery of human antiquity
Clicks: 88
ID: 206894
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
25.2
/100
84 views
21 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Why did Boucher de Perthes’ discoveries of
handaxes in the Somme River’s gravels need to be verified by English geologist Joseph
Prestwich, and antiquarian John Evans, before members of the French Academy of Sciences
changed their minds about evidence for the antiquity of humanity? The problem was not
with the evidence itself, but with the way Boucher de Perthes interpreted and published
it. Teetotal, but an over-imaginative Romantic, a provincial bureaucrat and an
antiquarian scholar, an autodidact, and a generous provider of charity to local workers
and early advocate for women’s education, Boucher de Perthes was not only eccentric and
remarkable, but also his own worst enemy. He was easily dismissed by the scientific
elite of Paris until more handaxes were found at other sites and in different countries,
and were recognised as being similar to those found at Abbeville.
| Reference Key |
sackett2014bulletinboucher
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;James Sackett |
| Journal | journal of porous media |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.5334/bha.242
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.