transition metal chemistry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4406 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

transition metal chemistry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name transition metal chemistry
Abbreviated Name transition metal chemistry
ISSN 0
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2018
Nucleophilic ligand substitution in triply deprotonated tetrapeptide complexes of copper (II) and nickel (II) with 1, 10-phenanthroline and 2, 2-bipyridine
Dennis, C Robert;Swarts, Jannie C;Langner, Ernie HG
, pp. 1-9
391 views
2020
Synthesis, structure and antioxidant properties of manganese(II), zinc(II) and cobalt(II) complexes with bis(benzimidazol-2-ylmethyl)allylamine
Wang, C.
Vol. 45 , pp. 523-529
344 views DOI
2005
¿nudo gordiano? o ¿laberinto sin salida? visualizando una forma de atar cabos para asumir los desafíos de la administración actual ¿nudo gordiano? o ¿laberinto sin salida? visualizando una forma de atar cabos para asumir los desafíos de la administración actual
;Sergio Alonso Castrillón Orrego
, No. 6 , pp. 11-27
271 views Abstract
2003
the medellin consumer: local or global? a psychographic approach the medellin consumer: local or global? a psychographic approach
;Yaromir Muñoz Molina;Juan Londoño Jaramillo
, No. 2 , pp. 11-29
270 views Abstract
2015
Syntheses, crystal structures, antitumor and antioxidant activities of two hydrazide-hydrazone-based transition metal complexes
Chang, H.
Vol. 40 , pp. 485-491
264 views DOI
2011
control in family businesses control en la empresa familiar
;Luis Cisneros;Guillermo Ramírez;Arturo Hernández
, No. 18 , pp. 49-76
259 views Abstract
2009
recruitment practices, a socially accepted instrument of domination prácticas de selección de personal, un instrumento de dominación socialmente aceptado
;Yenny Hernández Sánchez
, No. 14 , pp. 137-160
256 views Abstract
2004
importancia de los procesos y su aplicación en las organizaciones importancia de los procesos y su aplicación en las organizaciones
;Luis Fernando Agudelo Tobón;Jorge Escobar Bolívar
, No. 4 , pp. 67-79
221 views Abstract
2011
the donor-receptor relation in international cooperation management in medellín relaciones donante -receptor en la gestión de la cooperación internacional en medellín
;Sergio Castrillón Orrego;María Victoria Echavarría Goicoechea;María Eugenia Gallego Paláu;Marcela Wolff López
, No. 19 , pp. 45-65
219 views Abstract
2007
Mixed ligand palladium(II) and platinum(II) complexes of tertiary diphosphines and benz-1,3-imidazoline-2-thione, benz-1,3-oxazoline-2-thione or benz-1,3-thiazoline-2-thione
Al-Jibori, Subhi A.;Al-Zaubai, Afra S. S.;Mohammed, Modher Y.;Al-Allaf, Talal A. K.;
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 281-286
207 views DOI
View All 15 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.