Nature Materials | Journament

Journal Ranking

#164 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
31
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 hours ago

Nature Materials

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Nature Materials
Abbreviated Name nat mater
ISSN 1476-1122
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (460 total)

2017
an extended damage plasticity model for shotcrete: formulation and comparison with other shotcrete models
;Matthias Neuner;Peter Gamnitzer;Günter Hofstetter
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 82-
459 views DOI Abstract
2018
efficacy of octacalcium phosphate collagen composite for titanium dental implants in dogs
;Tadashi Kawai;Keiko Matsui;Yushi Ezoe;Fumihiko Kajii;Osamu Suzuki;Tetsu Takahashi;Shinji Kamakura
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 229-
407 views DOI Abstract
2018
the influence of the interlayer distance on the performance of thermally reduced graphene oxide supercapacitors
;Jun-Hong Lin
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 263-
396 views DOI Abstract
2018
method of fatigue-life prediction for an asphalt mixture based on the plateau value of permanent deformation ratio
;Yazhen Sun;Chenze Fang;Jinchang Wang;Xuezhong Yuan;Dong Fan
Vol. 11 , No. 5 , pp. 722-
351 views DOI Abstract
2017
vo2 thermochromic films on quartz glass substrate grown by rf-plasma-assisted oxide molecular beam epitaxy
;Dong Zhang;Hong-Jun Sun;Min-Huan Wang;Li-Hua Miao;Hong-Zhu Liu;Yu-Zhi Zhang;Ji-Ming Bian
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 314-
339 views DOI Abstract
2015
chitosan-coated collagen membranes promote chondrocyte adhesion, growth, and interleukin-6 secretion
;Nabila Mighri;Jifu Mao;Frej Mighri;Abdallah Ajji;Mahmoud Rouabhia
Vol. 8 , No. 11 , pp. 7673-7689
313 views DOI Abstract
2016
aluminium electrodeposition from ionic liquid: effect of deposition temperature and sonication †
;Enrico Berretti;Andrea Giaccherini;Stefano M. Martinuzzi;Massimo Innocenti;Thomas J.S. Schubert;Frank M. Stiemke;Stefano Caporali
Vol. 9 , No. 9 , pp. 719-
310 views DOI Abstract
2018
polymer-ceramic composite scaffolds: the effect of hydroxyapatite and β-tri-calcium phosphate
;Boyang Huang;Guilherme Caetano;Cian Vyas;Jonny James Blaker;Carl Diver;Paulo Bártolo
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 129-
307 views DOI Abstract
2016
design of decorated self-assembling peptide hydrogels as architecture for mesenchymal stem cells
;Annj Zamuner;Marta Cavo;Silvia Scaglione;Grazia Maria Lucia Messina;Teresa Russo;Antonio Gloria;Giovanni Marletta;Monica Dettin
Vol. 9 , No. 9 , pp. 727-
305 views DOI Abstract
2009
surface chemistry in nanoscale materials
;Alex V. Hamza;Marcus Bäumer;Theodore F. Baumann;Jörg Weissmüller;Arne Wittstock;Jürgen Biener
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 2404-2428
304 views DOI Abstract
View All 460 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
31
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.