Neotropical entomology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7437 / 33,987
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 เดือนที่แล้ว

Neotropical entomology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
การจัดทำดัชนี
scopus ncbi ulakbim
ชื่อย่อ Neotrop Entomol
ชื่อตัวย่อ neotrop entomol
ISSN 1678-8052
วัตถุประสงค์และขอบเขต
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/13744
คำแนะนำสำหรับผู้เขียน

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (61 total)

2012
novas economias: uma proposta de significação new economics: a proposal for meaning
;Guilherme Luís Roehe Vaccaro;Débora Oliveira da Silva;Luís Felipe Riehs Camargo;Christopher Rosa Pohlmann
Vol. 22 , No. 3 , pp. 490-501
420 views Abstract
2019
Life History Traits and Predatory Performance of Belostoma anurum (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae), a Biological Control Agent of Disease Vector Mosquitoes.
Valbon, W R;Haddi, K;Gutiérrez, Y;Cruz, F M;Azevedo, K E X;Perez Campos, J S;Salaro, A L;Oliveira, E E;
381 views DOI Abstract
Selectivity of neem to Trichogramma pretiosum Riley and Trichogrammatoidea annulata De Santis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae).
Hohmann, Celso L;Silva, Flávia A C;Novaes, Tanara G de;
Vol. 39 , No. 6 , pp. 985-90
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Investigations on the Genus Rhizoecus (Hemiptera: Rhizoecidae) with Description of Two New Species from South America.
Kaydan, M B;Konczné Benedicty, Z;Kondo, T;Ramos-Portilla, A A;Szita, É;
Vol. 48 , No. 5 , pp. 809-821
356 views DOI Abstract
2003
obtenção da voz do consumidor: estudo de caso em um hotel ecológico obtaining the voice of customer: a case study in an ecological hotel
;Augusto de Toledo Cruz Junior;Marly Monteiro de Carvalho
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 88-100
318 views DOI Abstract
2009
o subsetor de edificações da construção civil no brasil: uma análise comparativa em relação à união europeia e aos estados unidos the subsector of buildings of the civil construction in brazil: a x-ray of the sector compared to the european union and the united states
;Luiz Carlos Brasil de Brito Mello;Sérgio Roberto Leusin de Amorim
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 388-399
307 views DOI Abstract
2019
Host Preference and Fitness of Lysiphlebus testaceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Different Instars of the Aphid Schizaphis graminum.
Vieira, L J P;Franco, G M;Sampaio, M V;
Vol. 48 , No. 3 , pp. 391-398
303 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diverticula in Male Lycorea halia Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Danaini: Itunina)-Support Organs for Everted Hairpencils with Unique Ultrastructure.
Gnatzy, W;Fischer, O W;Kiesel, A;Vane-Wright, R I;Boppré, M;
294 views DOI Abstract
2019
Do Workers from Subspecies Acromyrmex subterraneus Prepare Leaves and Toxic Baits in Similar Ways for Their Fungus Garden?
Forti, L C;Andrade, A P P;Sousa, K K A;Camargo, R S;Matos, C A O;Caldato, N;Catalani, G C;Ramos, V M;
293 views DOI Abstract
2018
Orchid Bee (Apidae: Euglossini) Communities in Atlantic Forest Remnants and Restored Areas in Paraná State, Brazil
Ferronato, M.
Vol. 47 , pp. 352-361
281 views DOI
View All 61 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.