lipids | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3364 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

lipids

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim
Short Name lipids
Abbreviated Name
ISSN 0024-4201
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15589307
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (25 total)

2018
Projected Long-Chain n-3 Fatty Acid Intake Post-Replacement of Vegetables Oils with Stearidonic Acid-Modified Varieties: Results from a National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2008 Analysis.
Bowen, Kate J;Richter, Chesney K;Skulas-Ray, Ann C;Mozaffarian, Dariush;Kris-Etherton, Penny M;
Vol. 53 , No. 10 , pp. 961-970
415 views DOI Abstract
2014
territory, public policies and rural development in the municipality of caturitÉ, pb
;Helenize Carlos de Macêdo;Josandra Araújo Barreto de Melo;Rogério Barbosa Bezerra
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. -
258 views DOI Abstract
2009
geomorphologic habitats delimitation on region morro do chapÉu of state park
;Jocimara Souza Britto Lobão;Raquel de Matos Cardoso Vale
Vol. 4 , pp. -
224 views DOI Abstract
2011
sobre a dimensão vivida do território: tendências e a contribuição da fenomenologia
;Fernanda Cristina de Paula
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. -
215 views DOI Abstract
2016
model of brazilian urbanization: general notes
;Leandro da Silva Guimarães
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. -
185 views DOI Abstract
2013
“metamorphosis of inhabited space” according to a new economic activity: the exploration and exploitation of rocks ormanentais soil in the municipality of barra de sÃo francisco - north of espÍrito santo
;Frederico Castro Carvalho;Idelvon Poubel
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. -
185 views Abstract
2010
a questão dos recursos hídricos e as perspectivas para o brasil
;Marco Antônio Tomasoni;Josefa Eliane de Siqueira Pinto;Heraldo Peixoto da Silva
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. -
176 views Abstract
2012
old applications and new possibilities for the use of comparative method on geographical studies
;Paulo Roberto Baqueiro Brandão
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. -
170 views DOI Abstract
2010
estrutura urbana e representações: a invenção da zona sul e a construção de um novo processo de segregação espacial no rio de janeiro nas primeiras décadas do século xx
;Elizabeth Dezouzart Cardoso
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. -
161 views Abstract
2013
os arranjos produtivos locais (apls): uma breve explanação sobre o tema
;Lucas Labigalini Fuini
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. -
154 views Abstract
View All 25 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.