chemical engineering and processing: process intensification | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4380 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

chemical engineering and processing: process intensification

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name chemical engineering and processing: process intensification
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2006
Removal of VOCs by photocatalysis process using adsorption enhanced TiO2–SiO2 catalyst
Zou, Linda;Luo, Yonggang;Hooper, Martin;Hu, Eric
Vol. 45 , No. 11 , pp. 959-964
385 views DOI
2017
menakar kedalaman pengukuran demokrasi model indeks demokrasi indonesia (idi): beberapa catatan substantif dari kepulauan bangka belitung
;Ibrahim Ibrahim
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 133-149
223 views DOI Abstract
2016
pengembangan kompetensi dalam menunjang tugas pokok dan fungsi aparatur pemerintah pada badan koordinasi wilayah pemerintahan dan pembangunan
;Achmad Reza Fachrizi
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. 22-33
214 views DOI Abstract
2017
transformasional kepentingan rakyat dalam perspektif pemberdayaan masyarakat bagi penanganan kemiskinan sosial melalui government social responsibility (gsr)
;FX Sudjatmoko;Nur Dewi Setyowati
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 94-102
198 views DOI Abstract
2018
the pattern of collective memory denial experienced by the student victims’ mothers of 1998-1999 trisakti-semanggi tragedy
;Rizqy Amelia Zein;Ilham Nur Alfian
Vol. 31 , No. 1 , pp. 14-23
166 views DOI Abstract
2017
pengaruh kompetensi, motivasi, lingkungan kerja dan persepsi gaya kepemimpinan terhadap kinerja penyuluh keluarga berencana
;Nur Dwi Pujiyanto;Dyah Retna Puspita;Bambang Tri Harsanto
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 278-289
160 views DOI Abstract
2017
penguatan kelembagaan kelurahan pasca implementasi uu no. 23 tahun 2014 tentang pemerintahan daerah
;Bambang Tri Harsanto;Slamet Rosyadi;Wahyuningrat Wahyuningrat;Simin Simin
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 188-196
156 views DOI Abstract
2016
pemilihan penyembuhan penyakit melalui pengobatan tradisional non medis atau medis
;Ayu Setyoningsih;Myrtati D Artaria
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. 44-56
147 views DOI Abstract
2017
dominasi medis modern atas medis tradisional suku sumuri, teluk bintuni, papua barat
;Atik Triratnawati
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 174-187
120 views DOI Abstract
2016
konstruksi perempuan dan gender dalam gerakan tarbiyah di kampus-kampus universitas negeri di surabaya: sebuah modalitas pembangunan karakter bangsa
;Diah Ariani Arimbi
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 90-105
108 views DOI Abstract
View All 13 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.