menakar kedalaman pengukuran demokrasi model indeks demokrasi indonesia (idi): beberapa catatan substantif dari kepulauan bangka belitung
Clicks: 283
ID: 139131
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
283 views
49 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #2 of 13 articles by views in chemical engineering and processing: process intensification
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Indonesian Democracy Index is one of democracy gauge in Indonesia to comprehend democratic achievement and to arrange policy program in politic development. As a measuring tool, IDI faces various methodological problems related to the representation of democratic practical circumstances in the local area. This article focuses on two aspects, methodological discourses and notes of consolidation option taken to integrate IDI output as database and political development orientation. By using qualitative method through interview,
observation, documentation; this article found that there are substantive methodological problems about the technique to gather the data, distribution of data resources, difference in practical concept in understanding the data, and homogenization aspect that tend to override regional diversity with its various demographic characteristic. On the other hand, IDI faces the consolidation choice of its output in the context of dissemination and integration as an instrument in developmental planning. Without intending to delegitimize the process and consolidation option chosen by IDI, this article attempts to substantively challenge the way IDI interpret democracy and its choices about the consolidation path.
| Reference Key |
ibrahim2017masyarakat,menakar
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Ibrahim Ibrahim |
| Journal | chemical engineering and processing: process intensification |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
10.20473/mkp.V30I22017.133-149
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.