industrial \& engineering chemistry research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2420 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated منذ يوم

industrial \& engineering chemistry research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
الفهرسات
الاسم المختصر industrial \& engineering chemistry research
الاسم المختصر
ISSN
الهدف والنطاق
URL
تعليمات المؤلفين

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (22 total)

2012
on the kinematic motion primitives (kmps) - theory and application
;Federico Lorenzo Moro;Nikos G. Tsagarakis;Darwin G. Caldwell
Vol. 6 , pp. -
1,156 views DOI Abstract
2002
Vapor-Phase Adsorption of Hexane and Benzene on Activated Carbon Fabric Cloth: Equilibria and Rate Studies
Singh, Kunwar P.;Mohan, Dinesh;Tandon, G. S.;Gupta, G. S. D.
Vol. 41 , No. 10 , pp. 2480-2486
296 views DOI
2020
reduction of onset delay in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: prediction of hbo/hbr signals
;Amad Zafar;Amad Zafar;Keum-Shik Hong;Keum-Shik Hong
Vol. 14 , pp. -
293 views DOI Abstract
2018
adaptive admittance control for an ankle exoskeleton using an emg-driven musculoskeletal model
;Shaowei Yao;Yu Zhuang;Zhijun Li;Rong Song
Vol. 12 , pp. -
281 views DOI Abstract
2017
enhancing classification performance of functional near-infrared spectroscopy- brain–computer interface using adaptive estimation of general linear model coefficients
;Nauman Khalid Qureshi;Noman Naseer;Farzan Majeed Noori;Farzan Majeed Noori;Hammad Nazeer;Rayyan Azam Khan;Sajid Saleem
Vol. 11 , pp. -
265 views DOI Abstract
2014
a comparative analysis of three non-invasive human-machine interfaces for the disabled
;Vikram eRavindra;Claudio eCastellini
Vol. 8 , pp. -
260 views DOI Abstract
2017
a functional subnetwork approach to designing synthetic nervous systems that control legged robot locomotion
;Nicholas S. Szczecinski;Alexander J. Hunt;Roger D. Quinn
Vol. 11 , pp. -
258 views DOI Abstract
2014
ongoing behavior predicts perceptual report of interval duration
;Thiago S. Gouvêa;Tiago eMonteiro;Sofia eSoares;Bassam V. Atallah;Joseph J. Paton
Vol. 8 , pp. -
252 views DOI Abstract
2012
what is value – accumulated reward or evidence?
;Karl eFriston;Rick eAdams;Read eMontague
Vol. 6 , pp. -
248 views DOI Abstract
2013
effects of social intention on movement kinematics in cooperative actions
;Francois eQuesque;Daniel eLewkowicz;Yvonne Nathalie Delevoye-Turrell;Yann eCoello
Vol. 7 , pp. -
236 views DOI Abstract
View All 22 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.