Indexed in Journament

fems yeast research

ISSN 1567-1364· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #24,163 of 29,297 scored journals (34,016 indexed)
47 Articles
Scores higher than 17.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name fems yeast res
Abbreviated Name fems yeast res
ISSN 1567-1364
URL https://academic.oup.com/femsyr

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for fems yeast research
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 90.0 3.0
Diversity 11.1 26.2
Innovation 15.0 24.1
Community Impact 5.0 4.7
Content Distribution 20.6 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (47)

2019
2019
2013
a note on the difference between complicated and complex social systems
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 142-147
303 views Abstract
2015
the world is helping ukraine: can ukraine help the world?
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 36-42
300 views Abstract
2013
making central banks serve the real economy
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 148-154
299 views Abstract
2014
seed-idea: the coming revolution in education
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. v-vi
283 views
2016
financing human capital: families & society
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 36-47
282 views Abstract
2016
social responsibility and self-governance by the scientific community
Vol. 2 , No. 6 , pp. 13-19
275 views Abstract
2013
multiplying money
Vol. 1 , No. 6 , pp. 123-141
257 views Abstract
2026
Yeast chemical genetics to investigate mechanism of action of Pacific natural products
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
Microbial ecology of fermented foods
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
Iron acquisition mechanisms of human skin-associated fungi
15 views DOI Abstract
2026
Conserved and rewired MAPK networks in human fungal pathogens
22 views DOI Abstract
2026
Combinatorial engineering approaches for improved lipid production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
Biological Parts in Yeast Synthetic Biology: From Regulatory Elements to Predictive Design Platforms
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
Yeast Strain Development and Process Intensification in High-Gravity Fermentation
16 views DOI Abstract
2026
Transcriptomic Responses of Kveik Yeasts to Heat and Ethanol Stress
15 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Saccharomyces Genome Database - A History of Ideas and Accomplishments, 1994-2026
27 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
27.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #24,163 of 29,297 scored
(34,016 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

27.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

15.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

20.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.