Journal of virological methods | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1338 / 33,950
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

Journal of virological methods

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name J Virol Methods
Abbreviated Name j virol methods
ISSN 1879-0984
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-virological-methods
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (41 total)

2018
association between different contexts of physical activity and abdominal obesity and excess weight in adolescents.
Vol. 23 , No. spe2 , pp. -
412 views DOI Abstract
2010
relacionamento de diferentes domínios da atividade física habitual com indicadores de risco cardiovascular em adultos jovens do sexo masculino relationship of different physical activity domains with cardiovascular risk factors among male adults
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 591-597
410 views DOI Abstract
2018
2019
Analytical performances of the BD Veritor™ System for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus and influenzaviruses A and B when used at bedside in the pediatric emergency department.
Vol. 270 , pp. 66-69
335 views DOI Abstract
2016
7-week aerobic exercise training reduces adipocyte area and improves insulin sensitivity in wistar rats fed a highly palatable diet
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 12-17
287 views DOI Abstract
2008
Elimination of two viruses which interact synergistically from sweetpotato by shoot tip culture and cryotherapy.
Vol. 154 , No. 1-2 , pp. 135-45
286 views DOI Abstract
can power and anaerobic capacity reduce according to disordered eating behaviors in cyclists?
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 60-64
273 views DOI Abstract
2012
a comunicação dos treinadores de futebol de equipes infanto-juvenis amadores e profissionais durante a competição the coach's communication with scholastic and adult teams during soccer matches
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 262-672
271 views DOI Abstract
2015
cumulative incidence of youth obesity is associated with low cardiorespiratory fitness levels and with maternal overweight
Vol. 21 , No. 4 , pp. 407-414
269 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.