voprosy pitaniia | Journament

Journal Ranking

#640 / 33,947
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

voprosy pitaniia

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name vopr pitan
Abbreviated Name vopr pitan
ISSN 0042-8833
Aim and Scope
URL http://vp.geotar.ru
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (41 total)

2009
bnip3 as an atypical representative of the bcl-2 protein family. part 1: bnip3, a regulator of non-apoptotic programmed cell death
;Ewelina Swoboda;Leon Strządała
Vol. 63 , No. 835515 , pp. 409-417
423 views Abstract
2018
[Study of lutein and zeaxanthin content in the diet with the assessment of the relationship between the level of alimentary intake of non-vitamin carotenoids and the density of the macular region of the retina at a young age].
Kirpichenkova, E V;Korolev, A A;Onishchenko, G G;Nikitenko, E I;Lipatov, D V;Kuz'min, A G;Dyskin, Yu A;Denisova, E L;Fetisov, R N;
Vol. 87 , No. 5 , pp. 20-26
406 views DOI Abstract
2013
metody badania autofagii oparte na przemianach białek map1lc3 i p62/sqstm1 
;Edyta Wysokińska,;Wojciech Kałas
Vol. 67 , No. 863688 , pp. 442-448
356 views Abstract
2013
plasma carnitine concentrations after chronic alcohol intoxication 
;Alina Kępka;Napoleon Waszkiewicz;Beata Zalewska-Szajda;Sylwia Chojnowska;Paweł Płudowski;Emilia Konarzewska;Agata Szulc;Jerzy Robert Ładny;Krzysztof Zwierz;Sławomir Dariusz Szajda
Vol. 67 , No. 863688 , pp. 548-552
341 views Abstract
2019
[Biomarkers of vitamin status in obese school children].
Beketova, N A;Pavlovskaya, E V;Kodentsova, V M;Vrzhesinskaya, O A;Kosheleva, O A;Sokolnikov, A A;Strokova, T V;
Vol. 88 , No. 4 , pp. 66-74
316 views DOI Abstract
2011
development of a miniaturized dna microarray for identification of 66 virulence genes of legionella pneumophila
;Mariusz Żak;Piotr Zaborowski;Milena Baczewska-Rej;Aleksandra A. Zasada;Renata Matuszewska;Bożena Krogulska
Vol. 65 , No. 846636 , pp. 838-848
274 views Abstract
2014
serological profile of patients with systemic sclerosis
;Ewa Wielosz;Magdalena Dryglewska;Maria Majdan
Vol. 68 , pp. 987-991
268 views DOI Abstract
2012
investigations of seborrheic dermatitis. part ii. influenceof itraconazole on the clinical condition and the level of selected cytokinesin seborrheic dermatitis 
;Ewa Trznadel-Grodzka;Marcin Błaszkowski;Helena Rotsztejn
Vol. 66 , No. 855199 , pp. 848-854
259 views Abstract
2018
[Dietary intake of calcium in pre-school and school children in Russia: main food sources and eating occasions].
Martinchik, A N;Keshabyants, E E;Kambarov, A O;Peskova, E V;Bryantseva, S A;Bazarova, L B;Semenova, Ya A;
Vol. 87 , No. 2 , pp. 24-33
257 views DOI Abstract
2014
the role of selected cytokines and proteins analyzed in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in lung injury
;Monika Jedynak;Piotr Bobik;Andrzej Siemiątkowski
Vol. 68 , pp. 728-737
240 views DOI Abstract
View All 41 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.