Indexed in Journament

research in microbiology

ISSN 0923-2508· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #9,701 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
39 Articles
Scores higher than 66.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name res microbiol
Abbreviated Name res microbiol
ISSN 0923-2508
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/research-in-microbiology

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.7
Content Distribution 81.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for research in microbiology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 28.2
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 10.7 11.5
Content Distribution 81.6 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (39)

2019
Structure and gene cluster of the capsular polysaccharide of multidrug resistant carbapenemase OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strain KPB536 of the genetic line ST147.
475 views DOI Abstract
2018
A type III effector XopL is vital for Xanthomonas campestris pathovar campestris to regulate plant immunity.
469 views DOI Abstract
2005
Identification of different regions among strains of Yersinia pestis by suppression subtractive hybridization
Vol. 156 , No. 7 , pp. -
365 views Abstract
2012
las encuestas de movilidad y los referentes ambientales de los transportes
Vol. 38 , No. 115 , pp. 33-45
345 views Abstract
2010
vivir en campamentos: ¿camino hacia la vivienda formal o estrategia de localización para enfrentar la vulnerabilidad?
Vol. 36 , No. 109 , pp. 111-141
342 views DOI Abstract
1999
las sociedades locales en el contexto de la globalización: estudio de casos en uruguay
Vol. 25 , No. 74 , pp. 71-82
321 views Abstract
2019
Structure and gene cluster of the capsular polysaccharide of multidrug resistant carbapenemase OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strain KPB536 of the genetic line ST147.
475 views DOI Abstract
2018
A type III effector XopL is vital for Xanthomonas campestris pathovar campestris to regulate plant immunity.
469 views DOI Abstract
2015
incidencia del clima local en los procesos de planificación territorial: análisis bioclimático de la costa del sol occidental de málaga (españa)
Vol. 41 , No. 123 , pp. 187-210
218 views DOI Abstract
2015
programas de vivienda social nueva y mercados de suelo urbano en el perú
Vol. 41 , No. 122 , pp. 27-47
245 views DOI Abstract
2014
las consecuencias del urbanismo fragmentador en la vida cotidiana de habitantes de la ciudad de santiago de chile
Vol. 40 , No. 121 , pp. 5-28
279 views DOI Abstract
2014
reflexiones en torno a la participación en el desarrollo rural: ¿reparto social o reforzamiento del poder? leader y proder en el sur de españa
Vol. 40 , No. 121 , pp. 203-224
283 views DOI Abstract
2014
urbanismo na era vargas: a transformaÇÃo das cidades brasileiras vera rezende (org.)
Vol. 40 , No. 120 , pp. 265-269
246 views DOI
Journament Score
36.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #9,701 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

81.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.