Indexed in Journament

journal of indian prosthodontic society

ISSN 0972-4052· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.8/100
Journament Score
#9,228
Journament Rank
34
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name j indian prosthodont soc
Abbreviated Name j indian prosthodont soc
ISSN 0972-4052
URL http://www.j-ips.org

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (34)

1990
données ethnographiques sur le vécu traditionnel de la mort en pays basque-nord.
Vol. 42 , pp. 479-489
259 views Abstract
Assessment of the relationship between maximum occlusal force and median mandibular flexure in adults: A clinical trial study.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 76-82
253 views DOI Abstract
1992
estudio del polen atmosférico en san sebastian.
Vol. 44 , pp. 65-121
241 views Abstract
2008
reflexiones en torno a una arqueología de la guerra civil: el caso de laciana (león, españa)
Vol. 59 , pp. 291-312
211 views Abstract
1989
dataciones absolutas de los cráneos del yacimiento prehistórico de urtiaga.
Vol. 41 , pp. 23-28
186 views Abstract
2010
clima y ocupaciones en la galería de estatuas (atapuerca, burgos) en los últimos 14.000 años: relatos de una estalagmita
Vol. 61 , pp. 89-102
161 views Abstract
2009
tendencias en la investigación de la cerámica neolítica en la región cantábrica
Vol. 60 , pp. 187-200
115 views Abstract
2008
reflexiones en torno a una arqueología de la guerra civil: el caso de laciana (león, españa)
Vol. 59 , pp. 291-312
211 views Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.