journal of indian prosthodontic society | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2423 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of indian prosthodontic society

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name j indian prosthodont soc
Abbreviated Name j indian prosthodont soc
ISSN 0972-4052
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.j-ips.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (34 total)

2018
48. Redifining precision with methods of synthesis of silver nanoparticles and the uses in prosthodontics-a review.
Shenava, Aashritha;
Vol. 18
440 views Abstract
Comparative evaluation of diametral tensile strength of phosphate-bonded investment (ringless) material by using air-drying method, conventional hot air oven, microwave oven, and combination of microwave and conventional oven: An study.
Rathi, Akhil;Pande, Neelam;Radke, Usha;Deshpande, Saee;Chandak, Anuj;
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. 248-254
277 views DOI Abstract
2001
consideraciones sobre restos de primates de un yacimiento arqueológico del oriente de venezuela (américa del sur): bueva del guácharo, estdo monagas
;Bernardo Urbani;Edgar Gil
Vol. 53 , pp. 135-142
241 views Abstract
1990
données ethnographiques sur le vécu traditionnel de la mort en pays basque-nord.
;Michel Duvert
Vol. 42 , pp. 479-489
235 views Abstract
1992
estudio del polen atmosférico en san sebastian.
;Luis Echarri;Mª Luisa López
Vol. 44 , pp. 65-121
226 views Abstract
Assessment of the relationship between maximum occlusal force and median mandibular flexure in adults: A clinical trial study.
Ebadian, Behnaz;Abolhasani, Majid;Heidarpour, Anahita;Ziaei, Mohsen;Jowkar, Mohammad;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 76-82
224 views DOI Abstract
2008
la iglesia en su paisaje medieval. el estudio de agurain-salvatierra (Álava) a través de la lectura estratigráfica de alzados de la ermita de san martín
;Alfaro, Egoitz
Vol. 59 , pp. 247-267
210 views Abstract
2012
babel en la mina. el campamento minero como modelo de asentamiento en el mundo industrializado: cerro muriano (córdoba).
;Cano Sanchiz, J.M.
Vol. 63 , pp. 321-343
196 views Abstract
2008
reflexiones en torno a una arqueología de la guerra civil: el caso de laciana (león, españa)
;Alonso González, Pablo
Vol. 59 , pp. 291-312
193 views Abstract
2008
un modelo de producción en gruta: el alfar de cabrera d´anoia, barcelona
;Padilla, José I.;Alvaro, Karen;Travé, Esther
Vol. 59 , pp. 269-290
171 views Abstract
View All 34 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.