j chem soc pak | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1014 / 33,955
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

j chem soc pak

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name j chem soc pak
Abbreviated Name j chem soc pak
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://jcsp.org.pk
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2015
Synthesis of benzophenone hydrazone analogs and their DPPH radical scavenging and urease inhibitory activities
Scavenging, DPPH Radical
Vol. 37 , No. 03 , pp. 479
291 views
2007
an inquiry project: a way to develop a meaningful learning context la indagación: un camino para desarrollar un contexto significativo de aprendizaje
;Norha Esperanza Pineda Torres
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 59-74
262 views Abstract
2010
indigenous students’ attitudes towards learning english through a virtual program: a study in a colombian public university
;Ruth Elena Cuasilpud Canchala
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 133-152
257 views Abstract
2008
the virtual forum as an alternative way to enhance foreign language learning* el foro virtual como una alternativa para incrementar el aprendizaje del idioma extranjero
;Nicolas Alexander Hine;Amparo Clavijo Olarte;Luz Mary Quintero
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 219-236
209 views Abstract
2014
making sense of critical pedagogy in l2 education through a collaborative study group
;Paula Andrea Echeverri Sucerquia;Sebastián Pérez Restrepo
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 171-184
203 views DOI Abstract
2013
student-teachers’ teaching techniques: actors in pupils’ extrinsic motivation as they speak
;Báez Dueñas Leidy Tatiana;Chacón Vargas Leidy Marcela
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 69-84
199 views Abstract
2013
language policy and the manufacturing of consent for foreign intervention in colombia
;Valencia Marlon
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 27-43
199 views Abstract
2001
the challenge of effective vocabulary teaching
;Cárdenas B. Melba Libia
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. -
197 views Abstract
2006
from de-anglicization to internationalisation: cultural representations of the ukand the usa in global, adapted and local elt textbooks in argentina<a href=
;Enrique Alejandro Basabe
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 59-76
181 views Abstract
2013
the role of genre-based activities in the writing of argumentative essays in efl
;Chala Bejarano Pedro Antonio;Chapetón Claudia Marcela
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 127-147
174 views Abstract
View All 18 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
50
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.