Indexed in Journament

the scientific world journal

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.1/100
Journament Score
#9,899
Journament Rank
46
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name the scientific world journal

Indexings

doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (46)

2012
Is the Linear Modeling Technique Good Enough for Optimal Form Design? A Comparison of Quantitative Analysis Models
Lin, Yang-Cheng;Yeh, Chung-Hsing;Wang, Chen-Cheng;Wei, Chun-Chun;
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
542 views Abstract
2014
Reporting Misconduct of a Coworker to Protect a Patient: A Comparison between Experienced Nurses and Nursing Students
Mansbach, Abraham;Kushnir, Talma;Ziedenberg, Hana;Bachner, Yaacov G.;
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
483 views Abstract
2015
Thermal Behavior of an Asphalt Pavement in the Laboratory and in the Parking Lot
Martinkauppi, J. B.;Mäkiranta, A.;Kiijärvi, J.;Hiltunen, E.;
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
454 views Abstract
2011
Spatial Variability and Application of Ratios between BTEX in Two Canadian Cities
Miller, Lindsay;Xu, Xiaohong;Wheeler, Amanda;Atari, Dominic Odwa;Grgicak-Mannion, Alice;Luginaah, Isaac;
Vol. 11 , pp. 2536-2549
438 views Abstract
2014
Risks and Crises for Healthcare Providers: The Impact of Cloud Computing
Glasberg, Ronald;Hartmann, Michael;Draheim, Michael;Tamm, Gerrit;Hessel, Franz;
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
430 views Abstract
2018
improving student midwives’ practice learning in uganda through action research: the momentum project
;Joy Kemp;Eleanor Shaw;Sarah Nanjego;Kade Mondeh
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 1-23
429 views DOI Abstract
2014
Shelf Life and Quality Study of Minced Tilapia with Nori and Hijiki Seaweeds as Natural Additives
Ribeiro, Ingridy Simone;Shirahigue, Ligianne Din;Sucasas, Lia Ferraz de Arruda;Anbe, Lika;Cruz, Pedro Gomes da;Gallo, Cláudio Rosa;Carpes, Solange Teresinha;Marques, Marcos José;Oetterer, Marília;
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
410 views Abstract
2013
Kinetics and mechanism study of competitive inhibition of jack-bean urease by baicalin
Tan, Lirong;Su, Jiyan;Wu, Dianwei;Yu, Xiaodan;Su, Zuqing;He, Jingjin;Wu, Xiaoli;Kong, Songzhi;Lai, Xiaoping;Lin, Ji;others
Vol. 2013
396 views
2005
Natural Cytotoxicity Receptors: Pattern Recognition and Involvement of Carbohydrates
Porgador, Angel;
Vol. 5 , pp. 151-154
395 views Abstract
2016
what is the place of interprofessional education in supporting the continuum of care for patients?
;Annette Solman
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-2
392 views DOI Abstract
2018
improving student midwives’ practice learning in uganda through action research: the momentum project
;Joy Kemp;Eleanor Shaw;Sarah Nanjego;Kade Mondeh
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 1-23
429 views DOI Abstract
2018
person-centred healthcare research: a personal influence
; * Corresponding author: University of Windesheim, Zwolle, The Netherlands Email: am.vandenberg@windesheim.nl Submitted for publication: 3rd November 2017 Accepted for publication: 12th March 2018 Published: 16th May 2018 https://doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.81.011 Abstract Context: This critical reflection is about the positive effects for educational and research settings of participation in a two-day programme entitled ‘Using participatory action research and appreciative inquiry to research healthcare practice’. Aims: To reflect on the journey of positive developments in research and education that started with participation in this programme. Using Caring Conversations (Dewar, 2011) as a reflective framework of questions, this article discusses the journey in order to encourage others to consider the approach of appreciative inquiry to bring to life the concept of co-creation in research and education. Conclusions and implications for practice: Participation in this programme has led to the implementation of a variety of actions in educational and research settings. Central to all these actions is an appreciative approach to co-creation as a counterpart to today’s prevailing problem-based viewpoint. A possible factor behind these developments was the power of vulnerability experienced during the programme, a shared process of transformational learning. Implications for practice: This critical reflection: Provides an invitation to shift from a problem-based focus to a positive revolution Provides an appreciative reflective story about the power of vulnerability as an inspiration for others to move out of their comfort zone and seek to discover their own exceptionality Supports a shift from a facilitator-led to a co-creation approach in doing research and teaching with older adults Keywords: Emotional touchpoints, appreciative inquiry, Caring Conversations, practice development, co-creation, transformational learning theory   IDEAS AND INFLUENCES Person-centred healthcare research: a personal influence Hazel M. Chapman
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 1-3
98 views DOI Abstract
2018
bring learning into action
;Annemieke van den Berg;Belinda Dewar;Carolien Smits
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
246 views DOI Abstract
2017
Gabapentin Inhibits Protein Kinase C Epsilon Translocation in Cultured Sensory Neurons with Additive Effects When Coapplied with Paracetamol (Acetaminophen)
Vellani, Vittorio;Giacomoni, Chiara;
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
313 views Abstract
2016
a reflection on using play to facilitate learning
;Margaret Martin
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-8
188 views DOI Abstract
2016
what is the place of interprofessional education in supporting the continuum of care for patients?
;Annette Solman
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-2
392 views DOI Abstract
2016
PLL Based Energy Efficient PV System with Fuzzy Logic Based Power Tracker for Smart Grid Applications
Rohini, G.;Jamuna, V.;
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
230 views Abstract
2015
Comparison of Groundwater Level Models Based on Artificial Neural Networks and ANFIS
Djurovic, Nevenka;Domazet, Milka;Stricevic, Ruzica;Pocuca, Vesna;Spalevic, Velibor;Pivic, Radmila;Gregoric, Enika;Domazet, Uros;
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
264 views Abstract
2015
Thermal Behavior of an Asphalt Pavement in the Laboratory and in the Parking Lot
Martinkauppi, J. B.;Mäkiranta, A.;Kiijärvi, J.;Hiltunen, E.;
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
454 views Abstract
2014
A Decentralized Fuzzy C-Means-Based Energy-Efficient Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
Alia, Osama Moh’d;
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
167 views Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.