Indexed in Journament

the european journal of neuroscience

ISSN 1460-9568· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,297 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
58 Articles
Scores higher than 61.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name eur j neurosci
Abbreviated Name eur j neurosci
ISSN 1460-9568
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1460-9568

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for the european journal of neuroscience
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 55.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 10.7 13.4
Content Distribution 61.0 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (58)

2015
clinical experience with the first 40 cases with femtosecond laser cataract surgery technology: safety of the learning curve
Vol. 74 , No. 5 , pp. 292-296
526 views DOI Abstract
epidemiological and occupational profile of eye trauma at a referral center in espírito santo, brazil
Vol. 76 , No. 1 , pp. 7-10
473 views DOI Abstract
2001
Bacterial endotoxin sensitizes the immature brain to hypoxic--ischaemic injury
Vol. 13 , No. 6 , pp. -
435 views Abstract
2013
use of intravitreal bevacizumab or triamcinolone acetonide as a preoperative adjunct to vitrectomy for vitreous haemorrhage in diabetics injeção intravítrea de bevacizumabe ou triancinolona como adjuvantes da vitrectomia posterior no tratamento da hemorragia vítrea em diabéticos
Vol. 72 , No. 1 , pp. 12-16
398 views Abstract
2019
2020
The influence of metallothionein treatment and treadmill running exercise on disease onset and survival in SOD1 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mice.
393 views DOI Abstract
2007
GABAergic currents in RT and VB thalamic nuclei follow kinetic pattern of α3- and α1-subunit-containing GABA<sub>A</sub> receptors
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 657-665
393 views DOI
2003
Pairing elevation of [cyclic GMP] with inhibition of PKA produces long-term depression of glutamate release from isolated rat hippocampal presynaptic terminals.
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 903-8
381 views Abstract
2020
Response of the cerebral vasculature to systemic carbon monoxide administration - regional differences and sexual dimorphism.
378 views DOI Abstract
2020
Response of the cerebral vasculature to systemic carbon monoxide administration - regional differences and sexual dimorphism.
378 views DOI Abstract
2020
Melatonin mitigates hippocampal and cognitive impairments caused by prenatal irradiation.
349 views DOI Abstract
2020
The influence of metallothionein treatment and treadmill running exercise on disease onset and survival in SOD1 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mice.
393 views DOI Abstract
2019
Towards a standard model of musical improvisation.
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
Speech-in-noise understanding in older age: The role of inhibitory cortical responses.
219 views DOI Abstract
2018
Neural capacity limits during unconscious semantic processing.
Vol. 47 , No. 8 , pp. 929-937
216 views DOI Abstract
2015
distrofia policromática posterior da córnea
Vol. 74 , No. 3 , pp. 186-188
109 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,297 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

61.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.