the cochrane library | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1906 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

the cochrane library

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name the cochrane library
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (26 total)

2016
application of the online hearing screening test “earcheck”: speech intelligibility in noise in teenagers and young adults
;Marya Sheikh Rashid;Monique C.J. Leensen;Wouter A Dreschler
Vol. 18 , No. 85 , pp. 312-318
319 views DOI Abstract
2012
occupational noise exposure and regulatory adherence in music venues in the united kingdom
;Christopher Barlow;Francisco Castilla-Sanchez
Vol. 14 , No. 57 , pp. 86-90
301 views DOI Abstract
2006
Cholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease
Birks, Jacqueline S
300 views
2013
association and moderation of self-reported hypotension with traffic noise exposure: a neglected relationship
;Peter Lercher;Ulrich Widmann
Vol. 15 , No. 65 , pp. 205-216
297 views DOI Abstract
2014
tinnitus among serbian secondary school students in relation to their behavior and habits
;Zoran Marmut;Goran Belojevic;Dusan Backovic;Jelena Ilic Zivojinovic;Milena Tomanic;Ema Hadzic
Vol. 16 , No. 69 , pp. 73-78
283 views DOI Abstract
2013
effect of cigarette smoking on noise-induced hearing loss in workers exposed to occupational noise in china
;Liyuan Tao;Robert Davis;Nicholas Heyer;Qiuling Yang;Wei Qiu;Liangliang Zhu;Nan Li;Hua Zhang;Lin Zeng;Yiming Zhao
Vol. 15 , No. 62 , pp. 67-72
280 views DOI Abstract
2018
noise exposure and hearing loss in classical orchestra musicians: a five-year follow-up
;Alberto Behar;Marshall Chasin;Steve Mosher;Mohammad Abdoli-Eramaki;Frank A Russo
Vol. 20 , No. 93 , pp. 42-46
275 views DOI Abstract
2013
blood pressure of urban school children in relation to road-traffic noise, traffic density and presence of public transport
;Katarina Paunovic;Goran Belojevic;Branko Jakovljevic
Vol. 15 , No. 65 , pp. 253-260
271 views DOI Abstract
2018
utility of otoacoustic emissions and olivocochlear reflex in predicting vulnerability to noise-induced inner ear damage
;Sarantis Blioskas;Miltiadis Tsalighopoulos;George Psillas;Konstantinos Markou
Vol. 20 , No. 94 , pp. 101-111
248 views DOI Abstract
2014
noise in restaurants: levels and mathematical model
;Wai Ming To;Andy Chung
Vol. 16 , No. 73 , pp. 368-373
245 views DOI Abstract
View All 26 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.