response to mccunney et al.: wind turbines and health: an examination of a proposed case definition
Clicks: 198
ID: 192134
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
198 views
45 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #23 of 26 articles by views in the cochrane library
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract is not available for this article.
Login to Search Abstract
| Reference Key |
mcmurtry2016noiseresponse
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Robert Y McMurtry;Carmen M. E. Krogh |
| Journal | the cochrane library |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.4103/1463-1741.195805
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.