Indexed in Journament

macromolecular bioscience

ISSN 1616-5195· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,285 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
394 Articles
Scores higher than 61.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →
This journal has not been published yet.

About This Journal

简称 macromol biosci
缩写名称 macromol biosci
ISSN 1616-5195
URL http://www.mbs-journal.de

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for macromolecular bioscience
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 80.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 10.7 13.4
Content Distribution 42.5 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (394)

2015
mitochondrial protection by the mixed muscarinic/σ1 ligand anavex2-73, a tetrahydrofuran derivative, in aβ25-35 peptide-injected mice, a nontransgenic alzheimer's disease model
Vol. 8 , pp. -
489 views DOI Abstract
2015
extracellular environment contribution to astrogliosis – lessons learned from a tissue engineered 3d model of the glial scar
Vol. 9 , pp. -
462 views DOI Abstract
2016
systemic radical scavenger treatment of a mouse model of rett syndrome: merits and limitations of the vitamin e derivative trolox
Vol. 10 , pp. -
454 views DOI Abstract
2012
implications of aneuploidy for stem cell biology and brain therapeutics
Vol. 6 , pp. -
453 views DOI Abstract
2012
a comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal v2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques
Vol. 6 , pp. -
440 views DOI Abstract
2015
cortical synaptic transmission in cav2.1 knockin mice with the s218l missense mutation which causes a severe familial hemiplegic migraine syndrome in humans.
Vol. 9 , pp. -
433 views DOI Abstract
2020
mir-142-3p regulates bdnf expression in activated rodent microglia through its target camk2a
Vol. 14 , pp. -
422 views DOI Abstract
2015
non-additive modulation of synaptic transmission by serotonin, adenosine, and cholinergic modulators in the sensory thalamus
Vol. 9 , pp. -
421 views DOI Abstract
2013
early gene expression changes in spinal cord from sod1g93a amyotrophic lateral sclerosis animal model
Vol. 7 , pp. -
419 views DOI Abstract
2015
exploring the role of microglia in mood disorders associated with experimental multiple sclerosis
Vol. 9 , pp. -
418 views DOI Abstract
2026
Three rules for leading a paper discussion
23 views DOI Abstract
2026
Response to “Small islands, complex realities: Advancing One Health in the Philippines”
27 views DOI Abstract
2026
From snapshots to solutions: making camera-trap monitoring matter for conservation
26 views DOI Abstract
2026
Response to Quiatchon and colleagues: Higher education institutions can accelerate climate action around the world
25 views DOI Abstract
2026
Anthropogenic influence and wildlife intervention
38 views DOI Abstract
2026
At the leading edge: advancing and bridging the science and management of range-shifting species
26 views DOI Abstract
2026
Conservation enhances resilience of the United States Duck Factory as environmental shifts may diminish landscape-scale waterfowl breeding capacity
28 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,285 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

80.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

42.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.