south african journal of animal science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2479 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

south african journal of animal science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name south african journal of animal science
Abbreviated Name south african journal of animal science
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (30 total)

1970
Effect of feeding regime on the performance and blood parameters of male and female broiler chickens
Tůmová, E.;Chodová, D.;Härtlová, H.;Fučiková, A.;Ketta, M.;
Vol. 49 , pp. 244--252
327 views DOI
1970
Co-products in maize-soybean growing-pig diets altered in vitro enzymatic insoluble fibre hydrolysis and fermentation in relation to botanical origin
Fushai, F.;Tekere, M.;Masafu, M.;Akinsola, C.M.;Siebrits, F.;Nherera-Chokuda, F.V.;Kanengoni, A.T.;
Vol. 49 , pp. 201--218
305 views DOI
2015
growth and development of distance education in india and china: a study on policy perspectives
;Ashok Gaba;Wei Li
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 311-323
300 views DOI Abstract
2018
open praxis, volume 10 issue 2
;Inés Gil-Jaurena (ed.), various authors
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 99-208
293 views DOI Abstract
1970
Effect of probiotics, Saccharomyces spp.Kb-5 and Kb-8, in diets on growth performance and cholesterol levels in ducks
Bidura, I.G.N.G.;Siti, N.W.;Partama, I.B.G.;
Vol. 49 , pp. 219--226
285 views DOI
2017
differentiation in access to, and the use and sharing of (open) educational resources among students and lecturers at kenyan universities
;Judith Pete;Fred Mulder;Jose Dutra Oliveira Neto
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 173-194
284 views DOI Abstract
1970
Hydrogen peroxide concentration and DNA fragmentation of buffalo oocytes matured in sericin-supplemented maturation medium
Gustina, S.;Karja, N.W.K.;Hasbi, H.;Setiadi, M.A.;Supriatna, I.;
Vol. 49 , pp. 227--234
276 views DOI
2013
supporting learning through the use of self-reflection blogs: a study of the experience of blended learning students in the united arab emirates
;Adrienne A Isakovic;Allan McNaught
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 355-363
273 views DOI Abstract
1970
Prebiotic effects of oligosaccharides extracted from palm kernel expeller on different levels of Salmonella typhimurium infection in chicks
Rezaei, S.;Chen, W.L.;Candyrine, S.C.L.;Foo, R.Q.;Jahromi, M.F.;Farjam, A.S.;Zulkifli, I.;Liang, J.B.;
Vol. 49 , pp. 235--243
267 views DOI
2017
current status of the mooc movement in the world and reaction of the turkish higher education institutions
;Cengiz Hakan Aydin
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 59-78
258 views DOI Abstract
View All 30 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.