journal of the south african veterinary association | Journament

Journal Ranking

#372 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
32
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
40
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

journal of the south african veterinary association

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj
Short Name j s afr vet assoc
Abbreviated Name journal of the south african veterinary association
ISSN 2224-9435
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.jsava.co.za
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (33 total)

2019
Implication of the knowledge and perceptions of veterinary students of antimicrobial resistance for future prescription of antimicrobials in animal health, South Africa.
Smith, Peter W;Agbaje, Michael;LeRoux-Pullen, Lerica;Van Dyk, Deborah;Debusho, Legesse K;Shittu, Aminu;Sirdar, Mohamed M;Fasanmi, Olubunmi G;Adebowale, Oluwawemimo;Fasina, Folorunso O;
Vol. 90 , pp. e1-e8
404 views DOI Abstract
2005
Efficacy of orally administered powdered aloe juice (Aloe ferox) against ticks on cattle and ticks and fleas on dogs
Fourie, J.J.;Fourie, L.J.;Horak, I.G.;
Vol. 76 , No. 4 , pp. 193-196
336 views Abstract
2017
an update on the health benefits of green tea
;Wanda C. Reygaert
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 6-
326 views DOI Abstract
2016
a colorimetric method for the determination of the exhaustion level of granular activated carbons used in rum production
;Harold Crespo Sariol;Kenny Vanreppelen;Jan Yperman;Ángel Brito Sauvanell;Robert Carleer;José Navarro Campa
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 24-
323 views DOI Abstract
1970
Xenotransfusion with packed bovine red blood cells to a wildebeest calf (Connochaetes taurinus)
Buck, Roxanne K.;Stegmann, George F.;Poore, Luke A.;Shaik, Tahiyya;Gray, Travis;Zeiler, Gareth E.;
Vol. 89 , pp. 1--6
314 views DOI
1970
Detection of Salmonella from animal sources in South Africa between 2007 and 2014
Gelaw, Awoke K.;Nthaba, Palesa;Matle, Itumeleng;
Vol. 89 , pp. 1--10
306 views DOI
1970
Proactive udder health management in South Africa and monitoring of antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in dairy herds from 2001 to 2010
Karzis, Joanne;Petzer, Inge-Marie;Donkin, Edward F.;Naidoo, Vinny;
Vol. 89 , pp. 1--8
297 views DOI
2016
influence of sample storage on the composition of  carbonated beverages by mir spectroscopy
;Karma Pearce;Julie Culbert;Diane Cass;Daniel Cozzolino;Kerry Wilkinson
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 26-
284 views DOI Abstract
1970
Immunological response to Brucella abortus strain 19 vaccination of cattle in a communal area in South Africa
Simpson, Gregory J.G.;Marcotty, Tanguy;Rouille, Elodie;Chilundo, Abel;Letteson, Jean-Jacques;Godfroid, Jacques;
Vol. 89 , pp. 1--7
284 views DOI
2016
effect of different conditions of growth and storage on the cell counts of two lactic acid bacteria after spray drying in orange juice
;Joana Barbosa;Sandra Borges;Paula Teixeira
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 8-
275 views DOI Abstract
View All 33 Articles
44
Overall
Below Average
32
35
30
40
40
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.