international journal of hypertension | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1398 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

international journal of hypertension

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name int j hypertens
Abbreviated Name international journal of hypertension
ISSN 2090-0384
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijhy
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (62 total)

2019
Mobile Phone-Based Intervention in Hypertension Management
Andre, Nobian;Wibawanti, Retno;Siswanto, Bambang Budi;Andre, Nobian;Wibawanti, Retno;Siswanto, Bambang Budi;
Vol. 2019
291 views DOI Abstract
2017
Predictors of Hypertension in a Population of Undergraduate Students in Sierra Leone.
Lebbie, Aiah;Wadsworth, Richard;Saidu, Janette;Bangura, Camilla;
Vol. 2017 , pp. 8196362
290 views DOI Abstract
2009
ringparabeln
;Michael Stolleis
, No. Rg 15 , pp. 222-223
289 views DOI Abstract
2012
la sede apostolica tra chiesa tridentina e chiesa missionaria: circolazione delle conoscenze e giurisdizione pontificia in una prospettiva globale durante l’età moderna
;Giovanni Pizzorusso
, No. Rg 20 , pp. 382-385
260 views DOI
2019
The Mechanism of Acupuncture in Treating Essential Hypertension: A Narrative Review
Li, Juan;Sun, Mingsheng;Ye, Jing;Li, Yuxi;Jin, Rongjiang;Zheng, Hui;Liang, Fanrong;Li, Juan;Sun, Mingsheng;Ye, Jing;Li, Yuxi;Jin, Rongjiang;Zheng, Hui;Liang, Fanrong;
Vol. 2019
253 views DOI Abstract
2019
Heart Rate in Hypertension: Review and Expert Opinion
Dalal, Jamshed;Dasbiswas, Arup;Sathyamurthy, Immaneni;Maddury, Srinivasa Rao;Kerkar, Prafulla;Bansal, Sandeep;Thomas, Joy;Mandal, Sankar Chandra;Mookerjee, Soura;Natarajan, Sivakadaksham;Kumar, Viveka;Chandra, Nishith;Khan, Aziz;Vijayakumar, R.;Sawhney, J. P. S.;Dalal, Jamshed;Dasbiswas, Arup;Sathyamurthy, Immaneni;Maddury, Srinivasa Rao;Kerkar, Prafulla;Bansal, Sandeep;Thomas, Joy;Mandal, Sankar Chandra;Mookerjee, Soura;Natarajan, Sivakadaksham;Kumar, Viveka;Chandra, Nishith;Khan, Aziz;Vijayakumar, R.;Sawhney, J. P. S.;
Vol. 2019
231 views DOI Abstract
2016
customary law, legal consciousness and local agency. from sumatra to beauvais circa 1100 and back
;Charles de Miramon
, No. Rg 24 , pp. 266-275
229 views DOI Abstract
2016
two ›cultural translators‹ of islamic law and german east africa
;Mahmood Kooria
, No. Rg 24 , pp. 190-202
224 views DOI Abstract
2017
multinormativität in der gelehrtenkultur? versuche der normierung »guter gelehrter praxis« im 17. und 18. jahrhundert
;Marian Füssel
, No. Rg 25 , pp. 127-136
223 views DOI Abstract
2015
synoden schaffen räume: metropolen, diözesen und pfarreien in den synodalkanones des 9. jahrhunderts
;Wilfried Hartmann
, No. Rg 23 , pp. 174-184
219 views DOI Abstract
View All 62 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.