separation and purification technology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3633 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated vor 12 Stunden

separation and purification technology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexierungen
scopus ulakbim sci
Kurzname separation and purification technology
Abgekürzter Name separation and purification technology
ISSN 13835866
Ziel und Umfang
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/separation-and-purification-technology
Autorenhinweise
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (194 total)

2020
Removal of antimony from water by iron-coated cork granulates
Pintor, A.
Vol. 233 , pp. 0-0
463 views DOI
2020
A review on polyaniline-based materials applications in heavy metals removal and catalytic processes
Eskandari, E.
Vol. 231 , pp. 0-0
366 views DOI
2019
A novel amine double functionalized adsorbent for carbon dioxide capture using original mesoporous silica molecular sieves as support
Zhang G.
Vol. 209 , pp. 516-527
364 views DOI
2020
Extraction and complexation of americium(III) and europium(III) by a N-donor ligand of 3,5-bis(2-pyridyl)pyrazole
Yang, X.
Vol. 232 , pp. 0-0
353 views DOI
2016
several critical cell types, tissues, and pathways are implicated in genome-wide association studies for systemic lupus erythematosus
;Lu Liu;Xianyong Yin;Leilei Wen;Chao Yang;Yujun Sheng;Yan Lin;Zhengwei Zhu;Changbing Shen;Yinjuan Shi;Yajie Zheng;Sen Yang;Xuejun Zhang;Yong Cui
Vol. 6 , No. 6 , pp. 1503-1511
348 views DOI Abstract
2020
Fabrication of water-repellent double-layered polydopamine/copper films on mesh with improved abrasion and corrosion resistance by solution-phase reduction for oily wastewater treatment
Wang, J.
Vol. 233 , pp. 0-0
340 views DOI
2017
reproduction and in-depth evaluation of genome-wide association studies and genome-wide meta-analyses using summary statistics
;Yao-Fang Niu;Chengyin Ye;Ji He;Fang Han;Long-Biao Guo;Hou-Feng Zheng;Guo-Bo Chen
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 943-952
339 views DOI Abstract
2004
Comparative study of removal of volatile organic compounds by cryogenic condensation and adsorption by activated carbon fiber
Dwivedi, P.;Gaur, V.;Sharma, A.;Verma, N.
Vol. 39 , No. 1-2 , pp. 23-37
335 views DOI
2019
Synthesis of 3D Bi<inf>2</inf>S<inf>3</inf>/TiO<inf>2</inf> NTAs photocatalytic system and its high visible light driven photocatalytic performance for organic compound degradation
Guo R.
Vol. 226 , pp. 315-322
327 views DOI
2019
In-situ solid-state synthesis and regulation of Ag<inf>2</inf>O/Ag<inf>2</inf>CO<inf>3</inf> heterojunctions with promoted visible-light driven photocatalytic decomposition for organic pollutant
Hu J.
Vol. 226 , pp. 95-108
327 views DOI
View All 194 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.