case reports in oncological medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3796 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

case reports in oncological medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name case reports in oncological medicine
Abbreviated Name case reports in oncological medicine
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (42 total)

2019
Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience
Karivedu, Vidhya;Eldessouki, Ihab;Taftaf, Ahmad;Zhu, Zheng;Makramalla, Abouelmagd;Karim, Nagla Abdel;Karivedu, Vidhya;Eldessouki, Ihab;Taftaf, Ahmad;Zhu, Zheng;Makramalla, Abouelmagd;Karim, Nagla Abdel;
Vol. 2019
389 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Rare Delayed Atypical Pseudoprogression in Nivolumab-Treated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Suyanto, Suyanto;Yeo, Daniel;Khan, Sarah;Suyanto, Suyanto;Yeo, Daniel;Khan, Sarah;
Vol. 2019
360 views DOI Abstract
2014
ferrocenylethynyl - a versatile platform for new molecules to novel materials
;Hakikulla H. Shah;Rayya A. Al-Belushi;Muhammad S. Khan
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 15-42
309 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Case Presentation of a Patient with Microsatellite Instability and BRAF Mutant Metastatic Colon Cancer and Bibliography Update
Thomopoulou, K.;Tzardi, M.;Mavroudis, D.;Souglakos, I.;Thomopoulou, K.;Tzardi, M.;Mavroudis, D.;Souglakos, I.;
Vol. 2019
303 views DOI Abstract
2016
detection of unlabeled genetically modified soybean in the omani market
;Nabila Al-Sadqi;Aliya S. Alansari
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
289 views DOI Abstract
2015
histopathological and ultrastructural changes in the liver and gills of the killifish aphanius dispar (cyprinodontidae) exposed to aflatoxin b1
;Horiya H. Al-Azri;Taher Ba-Omar;Abdulkadir Elshafie;Michael J Barry
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
288 views DOI Abstract
2019
Choriocarcinoma Syndrome: A Potentially Fatal Complication of Testicular Cancer
Zeitjian, Vicken Sarkis;Arslan, Waqas;Borja-Alvarez, Andres;Amar, Surabhi;Zeitjian, Vicken Sarkis;Arslan, Waqas;Borja-Alvarez, Andres;Amar, Surabhi;
Vol. 2019
286 views DOI Abstract
1998
quantitative analysis of clay minerals using x-ray diffraction technique. part 1
;Amer Al-Rawas;Hector Sutherland;A.W. Hago;Adnan Basma;Badar Al-Shihi
Vol. 3 , pp. 31-39
273 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Rare Case of Grey Zone Lymphoma Successfully Treated with Brentuximab Vedotin and R-CHP Chemotherapy
Mallipudi, Rajiv M.;Alquran, Lance;Shenoy, Vishnu A.;Leslie, Lori A.;Conti, John A.;Mallipudi, Rajiv M.;Alquran, Lance;Shenoy, Vishnu A.;Leslie, Lori A.;Conti, John A.;
Vol. 2019
269 views DOI Abstract
2019
Small-Cell Type, Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Gallbladder: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Kumar, Kishore;Tariq, Hassan;Ahmed, Rafeeq;Chukwunonso, Chime;Niazi, Masooma;Ihimoyan, Ariyo;Kumar, Kishore;Tariq, Hassan;Ahmed, Rafeeq;Chukwunonso, Chime;Niazi, Masooma;Ihimoyan, Ariyo;
Vol. 2019
267 views DOI Abstract
View All 42 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.