Indexed in Journament

case reports in oncological medicine

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,783 of 29,298 scored journals (34,014 indexed)
42 Articles
Scores higher than 63.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name case reports in oncological medicine
Abbreviated Name case reports in oncological medicine

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 22.2
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.0
Content Distribution 63.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for case reports in oncological medicine
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 22.2 22.3
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 5.0 4.1
Content Distribution 63.8 88.9
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (42)

2019
Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience
Vol. 2019
434 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Rare Delayed Atypical Pseudoprogression in Nivolumab-Treated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Vol. 2019
403 views DOI Abstract
2014
ferrocenylethynyl - a versatile platform for new molecules to novel materials
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 15-42
364 views DOI Abstract
2015
histopathological and ultrastructural changes in the liver and gills of the killifish aphanius dispar (cyprinodontidae) exposed to aflatoxin b1
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Case Presentation of a Patient with Microsatellite Instability and BRAF Mutant Metastatic Colon Cancer and Bibliography Update
Vol. 2019
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
Choriocarcinoma Syndrome: A Potentially Fatal Complication of Testicular Cancer
Vol. 2019
347 views DOI Abstract
2016
detection of unlabeled genetically modified soybean in the omani market
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
337 views DOI Abstract
1998
quantitative analysis of clay minerals using x-ray diffraction technique. part 1
Vol. 3 , pp. 31-39
317 views DOI Abstract
2019
Small-Cell Type, Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Gallbladder: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Vol. 2019
315 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Rare Case of Grey Zone Lymphoma Successfully Treated with Brentuximab Vedotin and R-CHP Chemotherapy
Vol. 2019
314 views DOI Abstract
2019
Small-Cell Type, Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Gallbladder: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Vol. 2019
315 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Rare Delayed Atypical Pseudoprogression in Nivolumab-Treated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Vol. 2019
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Rare Case of Grey Zone Lymphoma Successfully Treated with Brentuximab Vedotin and R-CHP Chemotherapy
Vol. 2019
314 views DOI Abstract
2019
Treating Penile Cancer in the Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy Era
Vol. 2019
273 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Case Presentation of a Patient with Microsatellite Instability and BRAF Mutant Metastatic Colon Cancer and Bibliography Update
Vol. 2019
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience
Vol. 2019
434 views DOI Abstract
2019
Choriocarcinoma Syndrome: A Potentially Fatal Complication of Testicular Cancer
Vol. 2019
347 views DOI Abstract
2018
finite element approximation of variational inequalities: an algorithmic approach
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 114-119
83 views DOI Abstract
2018
connected components of h_(r,g)^a (g)
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 106-113
35 views DOI Abstract
2017
theorems on fixed points for asymptotically regular sequences and maps in
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 48-52
157 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,783 of 29,298 scored
(34,014 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

32.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

22.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

63.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.