case reports in endocrinology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#9266 / 33,987
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

case reports in endocrinology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name case reports in endocrinology
Abbreviated Name case reports in endocrinology
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (41 total)

2019
Unusual Case of Malignant Struma Ovarii and Cervical Thyroid Cancer Preceded by Ovarian Teratoma: Case Report and Review of the Literature
Tzelepis, Elias G.;Barengolts, Elena;Garzon, Steven;Shulan, Joseph;Eisenberg, Yuval;Tzelepis, Elias G.;Barengolts, Elena;Garzon, Steven;Shulan, Joseph;Eisenberg, Yuval;
Vol. 2019
478 views DOI Abstract
2019
Euglycemic Diabetic Ketoacidosis Secondary to Dapagliflozin in a Patient with Colon Malignancy
Papadokostaki, Eleni;Liberopoulos, Evangelos;Papadokostaki, Eleni;Liberopoulos, Evangelos;
Vol. 2019
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
Triglyceride Levels Greater Than 10,000 mg/dL in a 49-Year-Old Female without Evidence of Pancreatitis
Toor, Anika;Toor, Amit;Khalighi, Koroush;Krishnamurthy, Mahesh;Toor, Anika;Toor, Amit;Khalighi, Koroush;Krishnamurthy, Mahesh;
Vol. 2019
296 views DOI Abstract
2019
HDR Syndrome Accompanying Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypopituitarism
Can, Mustafa;Karakurt, Feridun;Kocabas, Muhammed;Cordan, İlker;Karakose, Melia;Kulaksızoglu, Mustafa;Can, Mustafa;Karakurt, Feridun;Kocabas, Muhammed;Cordan, İlker;Karakose, Melia;Kulaksızoglu, Mustafa;
Vol. 2019
290 views DOI Abstract
2016
efficient bureaucracy in the public sector for safe environment in romania
;Luminita IONESCU;Kari ROBERTSON
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 69-78
283 views DOI Abstract
2019
Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone Secretion (SIADH) and Subsequent Central Diabetes Insipidus: A Rare Presentation of Pituitary Apoplexy
Smedegaard, S. B.;Jørgensen, J. O.;Rittig, N.;Smedegaard, S. B.;Jørgensen, J. O.;Rittig, N.;
Vol. 2019
274 views DOI Abstract
2010
the analysis of the cfr travellers sa activity from the viewpoint of efficiency indicators
;Elena SIMA
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 69-77
262 views Abstract
2011
remarks on the marketing of educational nowadays
;Sebastian CHIRIMBU;Adina BARBU-CHIRIMBU;Silvia RAŞCU PISTOL
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 99-104
241 views Abstract
2017
a model of the influences of a forest fire on its neighborhoods and related risk management aspects
;Valentin POSEA
Vol. 16 , No. 4 , pp. 43-49
239 views DOI Abstract
2019
Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma and Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in the Same Patient as a Collision Tumour
Dikbas, Oguz;Duman, Aslihan Alpaslan;Guvendi, Gulname Findik;Dikbas, Oguz;Duman, Aslihan Alpaslan;Guvendi, Gulname Findik;
Vol. 2019
233 views DOI Abstract
View All 41 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.