case reports in dermatological medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2515 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
34.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

case reports in dermatological medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name case reports in dermatological medicine
Abbreviated Name case reports in dermatological medicine
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (23 total)

2019
Exclusive Cutaneous and Subcutaneous Sarcoidal Granulomatous Inflammation due to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Report of Two Cases with Unusual Manifestations and Review of the Literature
Mobini, Narciss;Dhillon, Rummit;Dickey, Jason;Spoon, Jordan;Sadrolashrafi, Kaviyon;Mobini, Narciss;Dhillon, Rummit;Dickey, Jason;Spoon, Jordan;Sadrolashrafi, Kaviyon;
Vol. 2019
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Giant Muscle Invasive Dermatofibroma Clinically Mimicking a Malignant Tumor
Kinoshita, Hideyuki;Ishii, Takeshi;Kamoda, Hiroto;Tsukanishi, Toshinori;Orita, Sumihisa;Inage, Kazuhide;Ohtori, Seiji;Yonemoto, Tsukasa;Kinoshita, Hideyuki;Ishii, Takeshi;Kamoda, Hiroto;Tsukanishi, Toshinori;Orita, Sumihisa;Inage, Kazuhide;Ohtori, Seiji;Yonemoto, Tsukasa;
Vol. 2019
320 views DOI Abstract
2019
Piperacillin/Tazobactam as Cause of Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis
Kyriakou, Aikaterini;Zagalioti, Sofia-Chrysovalantou;Patsatsi, Aikaterini;Galanis, Nikiforos;Lazaridou, Elizabeth;Kyriakou, Aikaterini;Zagalioti, Sofia-Chrysovalantou;Patsatsi, Aikaterini;Galanis, Nikiforos;Lazaridou, Elizabeth;
Vol. 2019
280 views DOI Abstract
2019
Desmoplastic Melanoma Arising after 1,064 nm q-Switched Nd:YAG Laser of a Suspected Solar Lentigo
Cohen, Leah;Nanda, Sonali;Zaiac, Martin;Cohen, Leah;Nanda, Sonali;Zaiac, Martin;
Vol. 2019
278 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Conditioned Media Ameliorate Psoriasis Vulgaris: A Case Study
Seetharaman, Rajasekar;Mahmood, Anjum;Kshatriya, Prashant;Patel, Divyang;Srivastava, Anand;Seetharaman, Rajasekar;Mahmood, Anjum;Kshatriya, Prashant;Patel, Divyang;Srivastava, Anand;
Vol. 2019
257 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Rare Case of Checkerboard-Like Becker Nevi with a Unique Distribution of Abnormalities
Wongtada, Chanidapa;Asawanonda, Pravit;Pongprutthipan, Marisa;Wongtada, Chanidapa;Asawanonda, Pravit;Pongprutthipan, Marisa;
Vol. 2019
240 views DOI Abstract
2016
pendugaan cadangan karbon atas permukaan tanah pada tipe penggunaan lahan dusung di pulau ambon
;Aryanto Boreel;R. Loppies R. Loppies;F.F. Tetelay F.F. Tetelay
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 214-221
209 views Abstract
2017
pendugaan cadangan karbon tegakan meranti (shorea leprosula) di hutan alam pada area silin pt inhutani ii pulau laut kalimantan selatan
;Lia Yunita
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 187-197
187 views DOI Abstract
2016
pengayaan vegetasi penutupan lahan untuk pengendalian tingkat kekritisan das satui provinsi kalimantan selatan
;Syarifuddin Kadir;Badaruddin Badaruddin
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. -
166 views Abstract
2016
pengolahan gula aren (arrenga pinnata merr) di desa banua hanyar kabupaten hulu sungai tengah
;Rosidah R Radam;Arfa Agustina Rezekiah
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 267-276
147 views Abstract
View All 23 Articles
34
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.