cardiovascular therapeutics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3227 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 minggu yang lalu

cardiovascular therapeutics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Pengindeksan
doaj ulakbim sci
Nama Singkat cardiovascular therapeutics
Nama Singkatan cardiovascular therapeutics
ISSN 1755-5914
Tujuan dan Ruang Lingkup
URL https://www.hindawi.com/journals/cdtp
Petunjuk untuk Penulis

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (28 total)

2019
New Insights into the Association between Fibrinogen and Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Vulnerability: An Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Study
Wang, Jun;Jia, Lu;Li, Xing;Jin, Siyu;Li, Xiaomei;Liu, Fen;Shan, Chunfang;Zhang, Yu;Yang, Yining;Wang, Jun;Jia, Lu;Li, Xing;Jin, Siyu;Li, Xiaomei;Liu, Fen;Shan, Chunfang;Zhang, Yu;Yang, Yining;
Vol. 2019
448 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cuban Sugar Cane Wax Acid and Policosanol Showed Similar Atheroprotective Effects with Inhibition of LDL Oxidation and Cholesteryl Ester Transfer via Enhancement of High-Density Lipoproteins Functionality
Cho, Kyung-Hyun;Bae, Myung-Ae;Kim, Jae-Ryong;Cho, Kyung-Hyun;Bae, Myung-Ae;Kim, Jae-Ryong;
Vol. 2019
407 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of the Effect of Fimasartan versus Valsartan on Blood Pressure Variability in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial
Shin, Dong Hoon;Song, Soohwa;Lee, Yeong Bae;Shin, Dong Hoon;Song, Soohwa;Lee, Yeong Bae;
Vol. 2019
383 views DOI Abstract
2013
Effect of levosimendan on estimated glomerular filtration rate in hospitalized patients with decompensated heart failure and renal dysfunction
Hou ZQ;Sun ZX;Su CY;Tan H;Zhong X;Hu B;Zhou Y;Shang DY;;
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. -
312 views Abstract
2008
infeksi neisseria gonorrhoeae akibat sexual abuse pada seorang anak perempuan
;Satya Wydya Yenny
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. -
272 views DOI Abstract
2015
pengaruh ovariektomi terhadap kadar vegf,tgf-β, igf, dan ca15-3 pada pasien kanker payudara stadium lanjut usia muda
;Rini Suswita;Wirsma Arif;Edison Edison;Zelly Diarofinda
Vol. 38 , No. 3 , pp. 189-200
268 views DOI Abstract
2012
pengaruh infeksi cacing usus terhadap ekspresi interferon gamma serum paska pemberian imunisasi tetanus toksoid
;Selfi Renita Rusjdi;Hafni Bachtiar;Nuzulia Irawati
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. -
249 views DOI Abstract
2015
korelasi antara nilai ankle brachial index dengan derajat kaki diabetes klasifikasi wagner di rsup dr m.djamil padang
;Rahmat Taufik;Raflis Rustam;Vendry Rivaldy;Hafni Bachtiar
Vol. 38 , No. 3 , pp. 181-188
222 views DOI Abstract
2014
identifikasi blastocystis hominis secara mikroskopis dan pcr pada sampel feses di laboratorium rsup. dr. m. djamil padang
;Eka Nofita;Nora Harminarti;Selfi Renita Rusjdi
Vol. 37 , No. 1 , pp. 26-31
219 views DOI Abstract
2008
efek imunomodulasi senyawa flavanoid kencur (kaempferia galanga linn) terhadap kemampuan mikrobisidal sel netrofil secara in vitro
;Gusti Revilla;Yanwirasti Yanwirasti;Erly Indrama
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 29-36
211 views DOI Abstract
View All 28 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.