Indexed in Journament

anesthesiology research and practice

ISSN 1687-6962· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #20,187 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
39 Articles
Scores higher than 31% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name anesthesiol res pract
Abbreviated Name anesthesiology research and practice
ISSN 1687-6962
URL https://www.hindawi.com/journals/arp

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for anesthesiology research and practice
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 33.3 25.8
Innovation 64.5 24.1
Community Impact 2.9 4.2
Content Distribution 44.8 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (39)

2019
Are Anesthesiology Providers Good Guessers? Heart Rate and Oxygen Saturation Estimation in a Simulation Setting
Vol. 2019
680 views DOI Abstract
2019
Subparalyzing Doses of Rocuronium Reduce Muscular Endurance without Detectable Effect on Single Twitch Height in Awake Subjects
Vol. 2019
570 views DOI Abstract
2019
Labor Epidural Analgesia to Cesarean Section Anesthetic Conversion Failure: A National Survey
Vol. 2019
562 views DOI Abstract
2019
Anesthesia Workspace Cleanliness and Safety: Implementation of a Novel Syringe Bracket Using 3D Printing Techniques
Vol. 2019
395 views DOI
2011
the making assessment count (mac) consortium maximising assessment and feedback design by working together
Vol. 19 , No. Supplement 1 , pp. -
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
Predictive Values of Preoperative Tests for Difficult Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Adult Patients at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital
Vol. 2019
359 views DOI Abstract
2019
Magnitude and Associated Factors of Awareness with Recall under General Anesthesia in Amhara Regional State Referral Hospitals, 2018
Vol. 2019
352 views DOI
2019
Epidemiology of Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury at Sylvanus Olympio University Hospital of Lomé in Togo.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 4038319
341 views DOI Abstract
2017
telfest: an approach to encouraging the adoption of educational technologies
Vol. 25 , pp. 1-14
335 views DOI Abstract
2009
the value of using short-format podcasts to enhance learning and teaching
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. -
317 views DOI Abstract
2019
Epidemiology of Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury at Sylvanus Olympio University Hospital of Lomé in Togo.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 4038319
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
Are Anesthesiology Providers Good Guessers? Heart Rate and Oxygen Saturation Estimation in a Simulation Setting
Vol. 2019
680 views DOI Abstract
2019
Magnitude and Associated Factors of Awareness with Recall under General Anesthesia in Amhara Regional State Referral Hospitals, 2018
Vol. 2019
352 views DOI
2019
Anesthesia Workspace Cleanliness and Safety: Implementation of a Novel Syringe Bracket Using 3D Printing Techniques
Vol. 2019
395 views DOI
2019
Subparalyzing Doses of Rocuronium Reduce Muscular Endurance without Detectable Effect on Single Twitch Height in Awake Subjects
Vol. 2019
570 views DOI Abstract
2019
Labor Epidural Analgesia to Cesarean Section Anesthetic Conversion Failure: A National Survey
Vol. 2019
562 views DOI Abstract
2019
Predictive Values of Preoperative Tests for Difficult Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Adult Patients at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital
Vol. 2019
359 views DOI Abstract
2017
telfest: an approach to encouraging the adoption of educational technologies
Vol. 25 , pp. 1-14
335 views DOI Abstract
2017
the management of schools’ websites in cantabria, spain
Vol. 25 , pp. 1-12
180 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
29.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #20,187 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

29.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

33.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

64.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

44.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.