anesthesiology research and practice | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3647 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

anesthesiology research and practice

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name anesthesiol res pract
Abbreviated Name anesthesiology research and practice
ISSN 1687-6962
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.hindawi.com/journals/arp
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (39 total)

2019
Are Anesthesiology Providers Good Guessers? Heart Rate and Oxygen Saturation Estimation in a Simulation Setting
Riveros Perez, Efrain;Jimenez, Enoe;Albo, Camila;Sanghvi, Yashi;Yang, Nianlan;Rocuts, Alexander;Riveros Perez, Efrain;Jimenez, Enoe;Albo, Camila;Sanghvi, Yashi;Yang, Nianlan;Rocuts, Alexander;
Vol. 2019
620 views DOI Abstract
2019
Subparalyzing Doses of Rocuronium Reduce Muscular Endurance without Detectable Effect on Single Twitch Height in Awake Subjects
Gelberg, Jan;Bentzer, Peter;Grubb, David;Gelberg, Jan;Bentzer, Peter;Grubb, David;
Vol. 2019
495 views DOI Abstract
2019
Labor Epidural Analgesia to Cesarean Section Anesthetic Conversion Failure: A National Survey
Desai, Neel;Gardner, Andrew;Carvalho, Brendan;Desai, Neel;Gardner, Andrew;Carvalho, Brendan;
Vol. 2019
487 views DOI Abstract
2019
Anesthesia Workspace Cleanliness and Safety: Implementation of a Novel Syringe Bracket Using 3D Printing Techniques
Long, Dustin R.;Doney, Allison;Bartels, Devan L.;Tan, Crystal E.;Sayal, Puneet K.;Anderson, Thomas A.;Agarwala, Aalok V.;Long, Dustin R.;Doney, Allison;Bartels, Devan L.;Tan, Crystal E.;Sayal, Puneet K.;Anderson, Thomas A.;Agarwala, Aalok V.;
Vol. 2019
349 views DOI
2019
Predictive Values of Preoperative Tests for Difficult Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Adult Patients at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital
Tamire, Tadese;Demelash, Habtamu;Admasu, Wosenyeleh;Tamire, Tadese;Demelash, Habtamu;Admasu, Wosenyeleh;
Vol. 2019
310 views DOI Abstract
2011
the making assessment count (mac) consortium maximising assessment and feedback design by working together
;Mark JP Kerrigan;Simon Walker;Mark Gamble;Sian Lindsay;Kate Reader;Maria-Christiana Papaefthimiou;Loretta Newman-Ford;Mark Clements;Gunter Saunders
Vol. 19 , No. Supplement 1 , pp. -
296 views DOI Abstract
2019
Magnitude and Associated Factors of Awareness with Recall under General Anesthesia in Amhara Regional State Referral Hospitals, 2018
Tamire, Tadese;Demelash, Habtamu;Yetneberk, Tikuneh;Kibret, Simegnew;Tamire, Tadese;Demelash, Habtamu;Yetneberk, Tikuneh;Kibret, Simegnew;
Vol. 2019
281 views DOI
2019
Epidemiology of Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury at Sylvanus Olympio University Hospital of Lomé in Togo.
Egbohou, Pilakimwe;Mouzou, Tabana;Tchetike, Pikabalo;Sama, Hamza Doles;Assenouwe, Sarakawabalo;Akala-Yoba, Gnimdou;Randolph, Lonlongnon;Tomta, Kadjika;
Vol. 2019 , pp. 4038319
280 views DOI Abstract
2017
telfest: an approach to encouraging the adoption of educational technologies
;Farzana Latif
Vol. 25 , pp. 1-14
265 views DOI Abstract
2009
the value of using short-format podcasts to enhance learning and teaching
;Catherine Sutton-Brady;Karen M. Scott;Lucy Taylor;Giuseppe Carabetta;Steve Clark
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. -
248 views DOI Abstract
View All 39 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.