Indexed in Journament

advances in operations research

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.9/100
Journament Score
#10,830
Journament Rank
30
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name advances in operations research
Abbreviated Name advances in operations research

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (30)

2019
Ranking-Theory Methods for Solving Multicriteria Decision-Making Problems
Vol. 2019
349 views DOI Abstract
2017
2015
trends and tactics of mouse predation on tristan albatross diomedea dabbenena chicks at gough island, south atlantic ocean
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 5-
342 views DOI Abstract
2013
canadian estimate of bird mortality due to collisions and direct habitat loss associated with wind turbine developments
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 10-
336 views DOI Abstract
2014
crop type influences edge effects on the reproduction of songbirds in sagebrush habitat near agriculture
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 8-
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
Credit Scoring: A Review on Support Vector Machines and Metaheuristic Approaches
Vol. 2019
315 views DOI Abstract
2016
assessing range-wide habitat suitability for the lesser prairie-chicken
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 2-
309 views DOI Abstract
2007
agricultural policy and nest success of prairie ducks in canada and the united states
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 5-
301 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multiobjective Simulated Annealing: Principles and Algorithm Variants
Vol. 2019
295 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ranking-Theory Methods for Solving Multicriteria Decision-Making Problems
Vol. 2019
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multiobjective Simulated Annealing: Principles and Algorithm Variants
Vol. 2019
295 views DOI Abstract
2019
Credit Scoring: A Review on Support Vector Machines and Metaheuristic Approaches
Vol. 2019
315 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparing pre- versus postoperational movement of nocturnal migrants around a wind energy facility in northeast british columbia, canada
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 3-
239 views DOI Abstract
2017
microphone variability and degradation: implications for monitoring programs employing autonomous recording units
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 9-
138 views DOI Abstract
2017
diet composition of a declining steppe bird the little bustard (tetrax tetrax) in relation to farming practices
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 3-
271 views DOI Abstract
2017
managing urban and rural rights-of-way as potential habitats for grassland birds
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 4-
137 views DOI Abstract
2017
determining conservation priority areas for palearctic passerine migrant birds in sub-saharan africa
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 2-
221 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.