Indexed in Journament

advances in operations research

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,838 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
30 Articles
Scores higher than 39.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name advances in operations research
Abbreviated Name advances in operations research

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 22.2
Innovation 64.5
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 74.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.1
Accessibility — 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 22.2 28.8
Innovation 64.5 31.2
Community Impact 5.7 13.4
Content Distribution 74.3 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (30)

2019
Ranking-Theory Methods for Solving Multicriteria Decision-Making Problems
Gogodze, Joseph;Gogodze, Joseph;
Vol. 2019
358 views DOI Abstract
2017
Towards Merging Binary Integer Programming Techniques with Genetic Algorithms
Zamani, Reza;
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
354 views Abstract
2015
trends and tactics of mouse predation on tristan albatross diomedea dabbenena chicks at gough island, south atlantic ocean
;Delia Davies;Ben J. Dilley;Alexander L. Bond;Richard J. Cuthbert;Peter G. Ryan
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 5-
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Effect of Welding on the One-Dimensional Cutting-Stock Problem: The Case of Fixed Firefighting Systems in the Construction Industry
Ágoston, Kolos Csaba;Ágoston, Kolos Csaba;
Vol. 2019
351 views DOI Abstract
2013
canadian estimate of bird mortality due to collisions and direct habitat loss associated with wind turbine developments
;J. Ryan. Zimmerling;Andrea C. Pomeroy;Marc V. d'Entremont;Charles M. Francis
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 10-
347 views DOI Abstract
2014
crop type influences edge effects on the reproduction of songbirds in sagebrush habitat near agriculture
;Elly C. Knight;Nancy A. Mahony;David J. Green
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 8-
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
Credit Scoring: A Review on Support Vector Machines and Metaheuristic Approaches
Goh, R. Y.;Lee, L. S.;Goh, R. Y.;Lee, L. S.;
Vol. 2019
326 views DOI Abstract
2016
assessing range-wide habitat suitability for the lesser prairie-chicken
;Catherine S. Jarnevich;Tracy R. Holcombe;Blake A. Grisham;Jennifer Timmer;Clint W. Boal;Matthew J. Butler;James Pitman;Sean C. Kyle;David Klute;Grant M. Beauprez;Allan Janus;William E. Van Pelt
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 2-
316 views DOI Abstract
2007
agricultural policy and nest success of prairie ducks in canada and the united states
;Mark C. Drever;Thomas D. Nudds;Robert G. Clark
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 5-
307 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multiobjective Simulated Annealing: Principles and Algorithm Variants
Amine, Khalil;Amine, Khalil;
Vol. 2019
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Effect of Welding on the One-Dimensional Cutting-Stock Problem: The Case of Fixed Firefighting Systems in the Construction Industry
Ágoston, Kolos Csaba;Ágoston, Kolos Csaba;
Vol. 2019
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ranking-Theory Methods for Solving Multicriteria Decision-Making Problems
Gogodze, Joseph;Gogodze, Joseph;
Vol. 2019
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multiobjective Simulated Annealing: Principles and Algorithm Variants
Amine, Khalil;Amine, Khalil;
Vol. 2019
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
Credit Scoring: A Review on Support Vector Machines and Metaheuristic Approaches
Goh, R. Y.;Lee, L. S.;Goh, R. Y.;Lee, L. S.;
Vol. 2019
326 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparing pre- versus postoperational movement of nocturnal migrants around a wind energy facility in northeast british columbia, canada
;Marc V. d'Entremont;Isobel Hartley;Ken A. Otter
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 3-
252 views DOI Abstract
2017
microphone variability and degradation: implications for monitoring programs employing autonomous recording units
;Patrick J. Turgeon;Steven L. Van Wilgenburg;Kiel L. Drake
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 9-
147 views DOI Abstract
2017
diet composition of a declining steppe bird the little bustard (tetrax tetrax) in relation to farming practices
;Carolina Bravo;Francesc Cuscó;Manuel B. Morales;Santi Mañosa
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 3-
280 views DOI Abstract
2017
managing urban and rural rights-of-way as potential habitats for grassland birds
;Lionel F. V. Leston;Nicola Koper
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 4-
142 views DOI Abstract
2017
northern pintail (anas acuta) survival, recovery, and harvest rates derived from 55 years of banding in prairie canada, 1960-2014
;Blake A. Bartzen;Kevin W. Dufour
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 7-
228 views DOI Abstract
2017
determining conservation priority areas for palearctic passerine migrant birds in sub-saharan africa
;Bruno A. Walther;Lionel H. Pirsig
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 2-
230 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,838 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

22.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

64.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

74.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.