advances in agriculture | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4392 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated il y a 2 semaines

advances in agriculture

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexations
doaj
Nom Abrégé advances in agriculture
Nom Abrégé advances in agriculture
ISSN
Objectifs et Portée
URL
Instructions aux Auteurs

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (30 total)

2018
Heritability Analysis and Phenotypic Characterization of Spider Plant (Cleome gynandra L.) for Yield
Munene, Ann Kangai;Nzuve, Felister;Ambuko, Jane;Odeny, Damaris;
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
436 views Abstract
2019
Effects of Breed, Age, Body Condition Score, and Nutritional Status on Follicular Population, Oocyte Yield, and Quality in Three Cameroonian Zebus Cattle Bos indicus
Dorice, Azafack Kana;Ferdinand, Ngoula;Justin, Kouamo;Augustave, Kenfack;Linda, Kenne Kaze;Dorice, Azafack Kana;Ferdinand, Ngoula;Justin, Kouamo;Augustave, Kenfack;Linda, Kenne Kaze;
Vol. 2019
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of Rainfall Variability on Crop Production within the Worobong Ecological Area of Fanteakwa District, Ghana
Kyei-Mensah, Conrad;Kyerematen, Rosina;Adu-Acheampong, Samuel;Kyei-Mensah, Conrad;Kyerematen, Rosina;Adu-Acheampong, Samuel;
Vol. 2019
304 views DOI Abstract
2019
Physiological Evaluations of Maize Hybrids under Low Nitrogen
Abubakar, A. W.;Manga, A. A.;Kamara, A. Y.;Tofa, A. I.;Abubakar, A. W.;Manga, A. A.;Kamara, A. Y.;Tofa, A. I.;
Vol. 2019
304 views DOI Abstract
2019
Grey Oyster Mushroom Biofarm for Small-Scale Entrepreneurship
Berhe Sbhatu, Desta;Abraha, Haftom Baraki;Fisseha, Hiluf Tekle;Berhe Sbhatu, Desta;Abraha, Haftom Baraki;Fisseha, Hiluf Tekle;
Vol. 2019
296 views DOI Abstract
2019
Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Variety Development for Moisture Deficit Areas of Eastern Amhara, Ethiopia
Kindie, Yirga;Bezabih, Aemiro;Beshir, Wubeshet;Nigusie, Zinabu;Asemamaw, Zelalem;Adem, Antenh;Tebabele, Birke;Kebede, Genet;Alemayehu, Tesfay;Assres, Fentaw;Kindie, Yirga;Bezabih, Aemiro;Beshir, Wubeshet;Nigusie, Zinabu;Asemamaw, Zelalem;Adem, Antenh;Tebabele, Birke;Kebede, Genet;Alemayehu, Tesfay;Assres, Fentaw;
Vol. 2019
291 views DOI Abstract
2019
Role of Maize Weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. on Spread of Aspergillus section flavi in Different Nepalese Maize Varieties
Bhusal, K.;Khanal, D.;Bhusal, K.;Khanal, D.;
Vol. 2019
283 views DOI Abstract
2015
analisis biaya manfaat program jaring pengaman sosial di kabupaten labuhan batu
;Esti Pancaningdyah
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 53-80
251 views DOI Abstract
2015
transformasi spirit enterpreneural (kewirausahaan) menuj good governance
;M Nur Budiyanto
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 1-12
242 views DOI Abstract
2015
kemitraan pemerintah-swasta dan relevansi terhadap reformasi administrasi negara
;Agus Dwiyanto
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 9-20
235 views DOI Abstract
View All 30 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.