OncoTargets and therapy | Journament

Journal Ranking

#523 / 33,944
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

OncoTargets and therapy

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name Onco Targets Ther
Abbreviated Name oncotargets and therapy
ISSN 1178-6930
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.dovepress.com/oncotargets-and-therapy-journal
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (24 total)

2015
Detection of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in lung cancer by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction
Qing Xu;Yazhen Zhu;Yali Bai;Xiumin Wei;Xirun Zheng;Mao Mao;Guangjuan Zheng;
Vol. 8 , pp. 1533--1541
450 views DOI Abstract
2015
Detection of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in lung cancer by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction
Qing Xu;Yazhen Zhu;Yali Bai;Xiumin Wei;Xirun Zheng;Mao Mao;Guangjuan Zheng and
Vol. 8 , pp. 1533-1541
419 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diagnosis and treatment of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer – a case report
Y, Bao;J, Wu;J, Zhang;Y, Yu;
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 4281-4285
391 views Abstract
2015
BRAF-mutant melanoma: treatment approaches, resistance mechanisms, and diagnostic strategies
Francesco Spagnolo;Paola Ghiorzo;Laura Orgiano;Lorenza Pastorino;Virginia Picasso;Elena Tornari;Vincenzo Ottaviano;Paola Queirolo;
Vol. 8 , pp. 157--168
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
t(15; 17) associated with primary myelofibrosis: a case report of an unusual clinical presentation and diagnostic dilemma.
Nadiminti, Kalyan;Silverman, Margarida;Bhagavathi, Sharathkumar;Vikas, Praveen;
Vol. 12 , pp. 5449-5455
378 views DOI Abstract
2015
BRAF-mutant melanoma: treatment approaches, resistance mechanisms, and diagnostic strategies
Francesco Spagnolo;Paola Ghiorzo;Laura Orgiano;Lorenza Pastorino;Virginia Picasso;Elena Tornari;Vincenzo Ottaviano;Paola Queirolo and
Vol. 8 , pp. 157-168
377 views DOI Abstract
2020
Nomograms for Prediction of Molecular Phenotypes in Colorectal Cancer.
Yu, Zhuojun;Yu, Huichuan;Zou, Qi;Huang, Zenghong;Wang, Xiaolin;Tang, Guannan;Bai, Liangliang;Zhou, Chuanhai;Zhuang, Zhuokai;Xie, Yumo;Wang, Heng;Xu, Gaopo;Chen, Zijian;Fu, Xinhui;Huang, Meijin;Luo, Yanxin;
Vol. 13 , pp. 309-321
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
LINC00958-MYC positive feedback loop modulates resistance of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells to chemo- and radiotherapy in vitro.
Huang, Shanshan;Zhan, Zhengyu;Li, Li;Guo, Hui;Yao, Yangyang;Feng, Miao;Deng, Jun;Xiong, Jianping;
Vol. 12 , pp. 5989-6000
336 views DOI Abstract
2020
FANCI Cooperates with IMPDH2 to Promote Lung Adenocarcinoma Tumor Growth via a MEK/ERK/MMPs Pathway.
Zheng, Pengchao;Li, Lei;
Vol. 13 , pp. 451-463
287 views DOI Abstract
2019
Intramedullary spinal cord metastasis in malignancies: an institutional analysis and review
J, Lv;B, Liu;X, Quan;C, Li;L, Dong;M, Liu;
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 4741-4753
279 views Abstract
View All 24 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.