Intramedullary spinal cord metastasis in malignancies: an institutional analysis and review

Clicks: 259
ID: 95355
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Jincai Lv,* Bailong Liu,* Xiaoyue Quan, Cheng Li, Lihua Dong, Min LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this work Background: Intramedullary spinal cord metastases (ISCM) in malignancies is a devastating issue with limited research. This study aims to identify the clinical features, management, prognostic factors, and outcomes of this special entity.Methods: A retrospective review of 61 patients of ISCM diagnosed and treated in our institute from June 2010 to March 2018 was conducted (lost to follow-up: 3). Data were retrieved according to the items including age, gender, primary tumor, interval to the ISCM occurrence, ISCM segments, and other synchronous metastases. The interventions, response, prognostic factors, and outcomes of ISCM were systematically analyzed.Results: Lung cancer (67.21%) was the commonest ISCM source, followed by breast cancer (14.75%). In total, 9.84% of patients presented with ISCM initially. The mean span from the primaries to ISCM was 18.77 months (range=0–10 years). The thoracic segment was most commonly involved (77.05%), followed by cervical (39.34%), lumbar level (34.43%), and conus medullaris (6.56%). The management of ISCM was challenging, since 55.74% of individuals had a poor physical condition (PS=3–4) and 72.41% had widespread dissemination synchronously (≥2 organs). Radiotherapy (RT) attained an objective response rate (ORR) of 61.90% or 62.50% and a local control rate (LCR) of 90.48% or 87.50% for symptoms used alone or with other strategies, respectively. ISCM bears a dismal prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of 4 months. Patients with only one segment involved had an apparently better prognosis than those with 2–4 involved segments (median OS=7.0 vs 3.0 months) (P<0.01). The OS of patients treated was remarkably superior to those without any intervention (median OS=5.0 vs 2.0 months) (P<0.01).Conclusion: ISCM is a distinct entity needing more attention for high cancer incidence, prolonged survival, and lack of research. RT is the mainstay with satisfactory effect. Multiple spinal cord segments involvement and no treatment are poor prognostic factors of OS.Keywords: intramedullary spinal cord metastasis, radiotherapy, combined treatment
Reference Key
j2019intramedullaryoncotargets Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors J, Lv;B, Liu;X, Quan;C, Li;L, Dong;M, Liu;
Journal OncoTargets and therapy
Year 2019
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.