Indexed in Journament

gastrointestinal cancer: targets and therapy

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,001 of 33,995 indexed journals
29 Articles
Accessibility 15
Engagement 30
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name gastrointestinal cancer: targets and therapy
Abbreviated Name gastrointestinal cancer: targets and therapy

Publications Per Year

Articles (29)

2012
oral morphine consumption reduces lens development in rat embryos
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 16-23
359 views Abstract
2016
methodological note: neurofeedback: a comprehensive review on system design, methodology and clinical applications
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 143-158
356 views Abstract
2015
EGFR signaling in colorectal cancer: a clinical perspective
Vol. 5 , pp. 21-38
356 views DOI Abstract
2015
EGFR signaling in colorectal cancer: a clinical perspective
Vol. 5 , pp. 21--38
338 views DOI Abstract
2014
the anticonvulsant and antioxidant effects of berberine in kainate-induced temporal lobe epilepsy in rats
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 124-130
333 views Abstract
2011
effect of different doses of soy isoflavones on spatial learning and memory in ovariectomized rats
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 12-18
327 views Abstract
2015
EGFR signaling in colorectal cancer: a clinical perspective
Vol. 5 , pp. 21--38
311 views DOI Abstract
2014
anxiolytic-like effects and increase in locomotor activity induced by infusions of nmda into the ventral hippocampus in rat: interaction with gabaergic system
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 267-276
303 views Abstract
2011
influence of nitric oxide in the central amygdala on the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced place preference in morphine sensitized rats
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 36-46
274 views Abstract
2014
operationalizing cognitive science and technologies’ research and development the “brain and cognition study group (bcsg)” initiative from shiraz, iran
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 104-116
263 views Abstract
2017
power spectral density analysis of purkinje cell tonic and burst firing patterns from a rat model of ataxia and riluzole treated
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 61-68
167 views Abstract
2017
the role of protein kinase b signaling pathway in anti-cancer effect of rolipram on glioblastoma multiforme: an in vitro study
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 325-336
254 views Abstract
2017
research paper: executive functions in students with depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 223-232
200 views Abstract
2017
the prevalence of restless legs syndrome in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis study
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 105-112
213 views Abstract
2016
methodological note: neurofeedback: a comprehensive review on system design, methodology and clinical applications
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 143-158
356 views Abstract
2016
impaired memory and evidence of histopathology in ca1 pyramidal neurons through injection of aβ1-42 peptides into the frontal cortices of rat
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 31-42
242 views Abstract
2016
case report: iatrogenic seeding of tumor cells in thigh soft tissue upon surgical removal of intracranial meningioma
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 159-164
255 views Abstract
2016
evaluation of berlin questionnaire validity for sleep apnea risk in sleep clinic populations
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 43-48
247 views Abstract
2016
papaver rhoeas l. hydroalcoholic extract exacerbates forced swimming test-induced depression in mice
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 195-202
199 views Abstract
2015
an fmri study of risky decision making: the role of mental preparation and conflict
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 265-270
185 views Abstract
Journament Score
39.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,001 of 33,995

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.