Indexed in Journament

clinicoeconomics and outcomes research

EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #16,121 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
24 Articles
Scores higher than 45% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name clinicoeconomics and outcomes research
Abbreviated Name clinicoeconomics and outcomes research
URL https://www.dovepress.com/clinicoeconomics-and-outcomes-research-journal

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.2
Accessibility 35.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 48.2 28.2
Innovation 28.5 30.1
Community Impact 10.0 11.5
Content Distribution 77.7 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (24)

2015
Gastrointestinal events and association with initiation of treatment for osteoporosis
Vol. 7 , pp. 603--613
417 views DOI Abstract
2017
Health care resource utilization before and after natalizumab initiation among patients with multiple sclerosis in Germany
C, Watson;C, Prosser;S, Braun;PB, Landsman-Blumberg;E, Gleissner;S, Naoshy;
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 85-97
407 views Abstract
2016
Scaling up health knowledge at European level requires sharing integrated data: an approach for collection of database specification
Vol. 8 , pp. 253--265
386 views DOI Abstract
2016
Scaling up health knowledge at European level requires sharing integrated data: an approach for collection of database specification
Enrica Menditto;Angela Bolufer De Gea;Caitriona Cahir;Alessandra Marengoni;Salvatore Riegler;Giuseppe Fico;Elisio Costa;Alessandro Monaco;Sergio Pecorelli;Luca Pani;Alexandra Prados-Torres and
Vol. 8 , pp. 253-265
379 views DOI Abstract
2016
Scaling up health knowledge at European level requires sharing integrated data: an approach for collection of database specification
Enrica Menditto;Angela Bolufer De Gea;Caitriona Cahir;Alessandra Marengoni;Salvatore Riegler;Giuseppe Fico;Elisio Costa;Alessandro Monaco;Sergio Pecorelli;Luca Pani;Alexandra Prados-Torres;
Vol. 8 , pp. 253--265
360 views DOI Abstract
2015
Gastrointestinal events and association with initiation of treatment for osteoporosis
Ankita Modi;Ethel S Siris;Jackson Tang;Shiva Sajjan;Shuvayu S Sen and
Vol. 7 , pp. 603-613
356 views DOI Abstract
2016
Patient-reported financial barriers to adherence to treatment in neurology
Vol. 8 , pp. 685--694
345 views DOI Abstract
2016
Patient-reported financial barriers to adherence to treatment in neurology
Lidia MVR Moura;Eli L Schwamm;Valdery Moura Junior;Michael P Seitz;Daniel B Hoch;John Hsu;Lee H Schwamm and
Vol. 8 , pp. 685-694
340 views DOI Abstract
2016
kontroversi hermeneutika sebagai manhaj tafsir (menimbang penggunaan hermeneutika dalam penafsiran al-qur’an)
;Reflita Reflita
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. 135-149
319 views Abstract
2015
studi hadis-hadis mukhtalif tentang mengumumkan kematian (al-na’y)
;Adynata Adynata
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 54-70
311 views Abstract
2018
analisis pemikiran sastra najm al-dÎn al-thÛfÎ dalam al-iksÎr fÎ `ilmi al-tafsÎr
;Lalu Supriadi Bin Mujib
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 14-28
253 views DOI Abstract
2017
ritual tolak bala pada masyarakat melayu (kajian pada masyarakat petalangan kecamatan pangkalan kuras kabupaten pelalawan)
;Hasbullah Hasbullah;Toyo Toyo;Awang Azman Awang Pawi
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 83-100
237 views DOI Abstract
2017
mengkritisi konsep islamisasi ilmu ismail raji al-faruqi: telaah pemikiran ziauddin sardar
;Muhammad Taufik;Muhammad Yasir
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. 109-123
183 views DOI Abstract
2017
Health care resource utilization before and after natalizumab initiation among patients with multiple sclerosis in Germany
C, Watson;C, Prosser;S, Braun;PB, Landsman-Blumberg;E, Gleissner;S, Naoshy;
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 85-97
407 views Abstract
2016
kontroversi hermeneutika sebagai manhaj tafsir (menimbang penggunaan hermeneutika dalam penafsiran al-qur’an)
;Reflita Reflita
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. 135-149
319 views Abstract
2016
the realism of aesthetics as the nearest image of god: a liberated ideology in the islamic aesthetics
;Gunawan Adnan;Widiarto Widiarto;Wilaela Wilaela
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. 197-210
281 views Abstract
2016
Scaling up health knowledge at European level requires sharing integrated data: an approach for collection of database specification
Enrica Menditto;Angela Bolufer De Gea;Caitriona Cahir;Alessandra Marengoni;Salvatore Riegler;Giuseppe Fico;Elisio Costa;Alessandro Monaco;Sergio Pecorelli;Luca Pani;Alexandra Prados-Torres;
Vol. 8 , pp. 253--265
360 views DOI Abstract
2016
Patient-reported financial barriers to adherence to treatment in neurology
Lidia MVR Moura;Eli L Schwamm;Valdery Moura Junior;Michael P Seitz;Daniel B Hoch;John Hsu;Lee H Schwamm;
Vol. 8 , pp. 685--694
301 views DOI Abstract
2016
Scaling up health knowledge at European level requires sharing integrated data: an approach for collection of database specification
Vol. 8 , pp. 253--265
386 views DOI Abstract
2016
Patient-reported financial barriers to adherence to treatment in neurology
Vol. 8 , pp. 685--694
345 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #16,121 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

48.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

28.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.