Indexed in Journament

Çukurova Üniversitesi İlahiyat fakültesi dergisi (ÇÜİfd)

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,787 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
51 Articles
Scores higher than 49.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Çukurova Üniversitesi İlahiyat fakültesi dergisi (ÇÜİfd)
Abbreviated Name Çukurova Üniversitesi İlahiyat fakültesi dergisi (ÇÜİfd)
URL https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cuifd

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Çukurova Üniversitesi İlahiyat fakültesi dergisi (ÇÜİfd)
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 19.4 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 12.1 7.8
Content Distribution 74.4 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (51)

2015
conocimientos en salud sexual y reproductiva en estudiantes de enfermería de una universidad de barranquilla (atl, col)
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. -
441 views DOI Abstract
2019
Yapay Zekâ: Geçmişi ve Geleceği
Vol. 19 , pp. 308--311
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
MUVAZAALI BOŞANMANIN HÜKMÜ
Vol. 19 , pp. 80--92
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
OSMANLI CEZA HUKUKUNDA HİLE (ALDATMA-DOLANDIRICILIK) SUÇLARI VE CEZALARI
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 119-139
330 views DOI Abstract
2019
Yapay Zekâ: Geçmişi ve Geleceği
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 308-311
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
ARAP TASAVVUFÎ ROMANLARININ YAPISI VE KURGUSU
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 251-262
324 views DOI Abstract
2019
İSLAM MİRAS HUKUKU İLE TÜRK MEDENİ KANUN MİRAS SİSTEMİNİN VARİSLER YÖNÜYLE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 60-79
304 views DOI Abstract
2019
İbni Sina Felsefesinde Suret Cevher ve Varlık
Vol. 19 , pp. 312--316
178 views Abstract
2019
Yapay Zekâ: Geçmişi ve Geleceği
Vol. 19 , pp. 308--311
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
ZORLUKLARLA BAŞA ÇIKMA BAĞLAMINDA BİR MODEL ÖNERİSİ: SABRA YOLCULUĞUN BEŞ HALİ
Vol. 19 , pp. 286--307
192 views DOI Abstract
2019
TARİH OKUMALARINDA YAŞANAN SAPMALAR ve İHMAL EDİLEN GERÇEKLİK OLARAK SÜNNETULLAH
Vol. 19 , pp. 275--285
184 views DOI Abstract
2019
Borden Parker Bowne'un Tanrı'nın Kişiliği Problemine Yaklaşımı
Vol. 19 , pp. 263--274
235 views DOI Abstract
2019
ARAP TASAVVUFÎ ROMANLARININ YAPISI VE KURGUSU
Vol. 19 , pp. 251--262
250 views DOI Abstract
2019
USÛL YAZIMINDA İKİ FARKLI YAKLAŞIM MOLLA HÜSREV ve FUDAYL ÇELEBİ ÖRNEĞİ
Vol. 19 , pp. 237--250
151 views DOI Abstract
2019
ŞEHİT AİLELERİNDE, GAZİLERDE VE GAZİ AİLELERİNDE SABIR VE DİNÎ BAŞA ÇIKMA İLİŞKİSİ
Vol. 19 , pp. 225--236
182 views DOI Abstract
2019
DİNDARLIK VE EVLİLİK UYUMU İLİŞKİSİ: EVLİ BİREYLER ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME
Vol. 19 , pp. 202--224
253 views DOI Abstract
2019
Televizyon Dizilerinin Toplum Üzerindeki Etkisi (Karabük Örneği)
Vol. 19 , pp. 185--201
242 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,787 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

19.4/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

74.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.