Indexed in Journament

senex: yaşlılık Çalışmaları dergisi

EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
26.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,888 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
16 Articles
Scores higher than 11.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name senex: yaşlılık Çalışmaları dergisi
Abbreviated Name senex: yaşlılık Çalışmaları dergisi
URL https://dergipark.org.tr/pub/senex

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 15.0
Community Impact 12.1
Content Distribution 71.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity — 24.4
Innovation 15.0 25.7
Community Impact 12.1 5.8
Content Distribution 71.9 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2015
pembagian pecahan terintegrasi dengan konsep lain melalui pendidikan matematika realistik indonesia
;Muhamad Saleh;Muhammad Isa
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 55-64
264 views DOI Abstract
2013
kekontinuan fungsi pada ruang metrik
;Cece Kustiawan
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 55-64
264 views DOI Abstract
2012
grup permutasi siklis dalam permainan suit
;Bagus Ardi Saputro
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 153-158
261 views DOI Abstract
2018
the strategy of formulate-share-listen-create to improve vocational high school students’ mathematical problem posing ability and mathematical disposition on probability concept
;Tina Rosyana;M. Afrilianto;Eka Senjayawati
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
257 views DOI Abstract
2012
pembelajaran matematika humanis dengan metaphorical thinking untuk meningkatkan kepercayaan diri siswa
;Heris Hendriana
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 90-103
248 views DOI Abstract
2015
pembelajaran icare (inroduction, connect, apply, reflect, extend) dalam tutorial online untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis mahasiswa ut
;Yumiati Yumiati;Endang Wahyuningrum
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 182-189
225 views DOI Abstract
2019
Yaşlanma ve Yaşlılık Çalışmalarına Eleştirel Bir Bakış
Pelin Tokatlı and
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 1-3
215 views Abstract
2015
efektivitas pembelajaran kooperatif ditinjau dari peningkatan kemampuan penalaran logis matematis siswa
;Karman Lanani
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 140-151
215 views DOI Abstract
2019
Yaşlanma ve Yaşlılık Çalışmalarına Eleştirel Bir Bakış
Pelin Tokatlı;
Vol. 3 , pp. 1--3
213 views Abstract
2017
the relation between self-efficacy toward math with the math communication competence
;Sylvia Rahmi;Rifka Nadia;Bibih Hasibah;Wahyu Hidayat
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 177-182
213 views DOI Abstract
2019
Yaşlanma ve Yaşlılık Çalışmalarına Eleştirel Bir Bakış
Pelin Tokatlı;
Vol. 3 , pp. 1--3
213 views Abstract
2019
Yaşlanma ve Yaşlılık Çalışmalarına Eleştirel Bir Bakış
Pelin Tokatlı and
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 1-3
215 views Abstract
2018
the strategy of formulate-share-listen-create to improve vocational high school students’ mathematical problem posing ability and mathematical disposition on probability concept
;Tina Rosyana;M. Afrilianto;Eka Senjayawati
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
257 views DOI Abstract
2017
the relation between self-efficacy toward math with the math communication competence
;Sylvia Rahmi;Rifka Nadia;Bibih Hasibah;Wahyu Hidayat
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 177-182
213 views DOI Abstract
2017
language literacy and mathematics competence effect toward word problems solving
;Namirah Fatmanissa;Rahmat Sagara
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 195-206
66 views DOI Abstract
2017
Etik Gıda Tüketiminde Yaşa Bağlı Olarak Ortaya Çıkan Beğeni Tercihleri: İstanbul’da Etnografik Alan Çalışması
Konyar, Hürriyet;
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 33-47
46 views Abstract
2015
pembelajaran icare (inroduction, connect, apply, reflect, extend) dalam tutorial online untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis mahasiswa ut
;Yumiati Yumiati;Endang Wahyuningrum
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 182-189
225 views DOI Abstract
2015
pembagian pecahan terintegrasi dengan konsep lain melalui pendidikan matematika realistik indonesia
;Muhamad Saleh;Muhammad Isa
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 55-64
264 views DOI Abstract
2015
efektivitas pembelajaran kooperatif ditinjau dari peningkatan kemampuan penalaran logis matematis siswa
;Karman Lanani
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 140-151
215 views DOI Abstract
2014
aplikasi metode-metode agglomerative dalam analisis klaster pada data tingkat polusi udara
;Dewi Rachmatin
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 133-149
165 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
26.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,888 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

26.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

15.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.