british journal of psychology (london, england : 1953) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#321 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 9 hours ago

british journal of psychology (london, england : 1953)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name br j psychol
Abbreviated Name br j psychol
ISSN 2044-8295
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (215 total)

2017
effect of bentonite on the pelleting properties of iron concentrate
;Hao Liu;Bing Xie;Yue-lin Qin
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
567 views DOI Abstract
2017
enhanced wettability modification and co2 solubility effect by carbonated low salinity water injection in carbonate reservoirs
;Ji Ho Lee;Kun Sang Lee
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
310 views DOI Abstract
2011
Relationships between right-wing authoritarianism, terrorism threat, and attitudes towards restrictions of civil rights: a comparison among four European countries.
Kossowska, Małgorzata;Trejtowicz, Mariusz;de Lemus, Soledad;Bukowski, Marcin;Van Hiel, Alain;Goodwin, Robin;
Vol. 102 , No. 2 , pp. 245-59
309 views DOI Abstract
2013
kinetic and mechanistic studies on the interaction of glycyl-l-alanine, glycyl-l-asparagine, and glycyl-l-tyrosine with hydroxopentaaquarhodium(iii) ion
;Biplab K. Bera;Sumon Ray;Subala Mondal;Parnajyoti Karmakar;Arup Mandal;Subhasis Mallick;Alak K. Ghosh
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
301 views DOI Abstract
2019
Intentionally remembering or forgetting own- and other-race faces: Evidence from directed forgetting.
Tüttenberg, Simone C;Wiese, Holger;
286 views DOI Abstract
2013
imidazole and triazole coordination chemistry for antifouling coatings
;Markus Andersson Trojer;Alireza Movahedi;Hans Blanck;Magnus Nydén
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
284 views DOI Abstract
2017
α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities of phenolic extracts from eucalyptus grandis × e. urophylla bark
;Ping Jiang;Jia Xiong;Fei Wang;Mary H. Grace;Mary Ann Lila;Rui Xu
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
281 views DOI Abstract
2013
synthesis of substituted thioureas and their sulfur heterocyclic systems of p-amino salicylic acid as antimycobacterial agents
;Mohammed Saleh I. T. Makki;Reda M. Abdel-Rahman;Hassan M. Faidallah;Khalid Ali Khan
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
281 views DOI Abstract
2019
Towards a 'manifesto' for super-recognizer research.
Ramon, Meike;Bobak, Anna K;White, David;
278 views DOI Abstract
2013
in vitro antioxidant and anticancer activity of flavonoid fraction from the aerial parts of cissus quadrangularis linn. against human breast carcinoma cell lines
;A. Vijayalakshmi;P. R. Kumar;S. Sakthi Priyadarsini;C. Meenaxshi
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
270 views DOI Abstract
View All 215 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.