Indexed in Journament

british journal of psychology (london, england : 1953)

ISSN 2044-8295· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #7,083 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
215 Articles
Scores higher than 75.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name br j psychol
Abbreviated Name br j psychol
ISSN 2044-8295
URL https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/20448295

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for british journal of psychology (london, england : 1953)
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 63.0 25.8
Innovation 63.0 27.4
Community Impact 2.1 7.8
Content Distribution 63.5 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (215)

2017
effect of bentonite on the pelleting properties of iron concentrate
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
679 views DOI Abstract
2011
Relationships between right-wing authoritarianism, terrorism threat, and attitudes towards restrictions of civil rights: a comparison among four European countries.
Vol. 102 , No. 2 , pp. 245-59
380 views DOI Abstract
2013
kinetic and mechanistic studies on the interaction of glycyl-l-alanine, glycyl-l-asparagine, and glycyl-l-tyrosine with hydroxopentaaquarhodium(iii) ion
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
374 views DOI Abstract
2017
α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities of phenolic extracts from eucalyptus grandis × e. urophylla bark
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
370 views DOI Abstract
2008
Deliberate practice predicts performance over time in adolescent chess players and drop-outs: a linear mixed models analysis.
Vol. 99 , No. Pt 4 , pp. 473-97
367 views DOI Abstract
2013
imidazole and triazole coordination chemistry for antifouling coatings
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
364 views DOI Abstract
2013
synthesis of substituted thioureas and their sulfur heterocyclic systems of p-amino salicylic acid as antimycobacterial agents
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Towards a 'manifesto' for super-recognizer research.
361 views DOI Abstract
2020
biosorptive removal of cadmium(ii) and copper(ii) using microwave-assisted thiourea-modified sorghum bicolor agrowaste
Vol. 2020 , pp. -
219 views DOI Abstract
2019
Towards a 'manifesto' for super-recognizer research.
361 views DOI Abstract
2018
chemical characteristics of precipitation in a typical urban site of the hinterland in three gorges reservoir, china
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
30 views DOI Abstract
2018
distribution and identification of sources of heavy metals in the voghji river basin impacted by mining activities (armenia)
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
141 views DOI Abstract
2018
m-polynomials and degree-based topological indices of triangular, hourglass, and jagged-rectangle benzenoid systems
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
106 views DOI Abstract
2018
optimization of deep oxidative desulfurization process using ionic liquid and potassium monopersulfate
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
159 views DOI Abstract
2018
synthesis, characterization, and antioxidant activities of genistein, biochanin a, and their analogues
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
232 views DOI Abstract
2017
synthesis and anticancer activities of 4-[(halophenyl)diazenyl]phenol and 4-[(halophenyl)diazenyl]phenyl aspirinate derivatives against nasopharyngeal cancer cell lines
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
232 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #7,083 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

63.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

63.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

63.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.