Indexed in Journament

ege eğitim dergisi

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,041 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
91 Articles
Scores higher than 41.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →
This journal has not been published yet.

About This Journal

Short Name ege eğitim dergisi
Abbreviated Name ege eğitim dergisi
URL https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/egeefd

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for ege eğitim dergisi
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.1
Accessibility 35.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 18.9 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.0 13.4
Content Distribution 79.8 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (91)

2016
biochemical responses of two soybean (glycine max) varieties to aluminum stress in nutrient solution
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. -
400 views Abstract
2019
Öğretmen Adaylarının Matematik Öğretimine Yönelik Eğitsel Dijital Oyun Tasarımlarının ve Tasarım Sürecine ilişkin Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 262-278
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bibliyografik Künye Karekodu Oluşturma Etkinliğine Yönelik Öğrenci, Öğretmen ve Okul Kütüphanecisi Görüşleri
Vol. 20 , pp. 196--208
376 views DOI Abstract
2013
kinetic study of free radicals scavenging by saffron petal extracts
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. -
364 views Abstract
2019
Sınıf Öğretmenleri ve Okul Yöneticilerinin İlkokul Programlarının Güncellenmesine İlişkin Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 209-222
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
Öğretmen Adaylarının Hayat Boyu Öğrenme ve Yetişkin Eğitimi Dersine Yönelik Görüşleri
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 51-66
324 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ergenler İçin Zihinsel Dayanıklılık Ölçeği: Türkçe Uzun ve Kısa Formun Psikometrik Özellikleri
Vol. 20 , pp. 322--334
193 views DOI Abstract
2019
Okul Öncesi Eğitim Kurumlarına Devam Eden Çocukların Sosyal Yetkinlik Davranışlarının İncelenmesi
Vol. 20 , pp. 305--321
168 views DOI Abstract
2019
Lider-Üye Etkileşiminin Öğretmen Stres, Tükenmişlik ve Depresyonu Üzerindeki Rolü
Vol. 20 , pp. 291--304
224 views DOI Abstract
2019
BÖTE Bölümlerine 2017 Yılında Yerleşen Öğrencilerin Tercihlerini Etkileyen Faktörler
Vol. 20 , pp. 279--290
170 views DOI Abstract
2019
Veri ve Olasılık Öğrenme Alanlarında Yapılmış Çalışmaların İçerik Analizi
Vol. 20 , pp. 244--261
202 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sınıf Öğretmenleri ve Okul Yöneticilerinin İlkokul Programlarının Güncellenmesine İlişkin Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi
Vol. 20 , pp. 209--222
270 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bibliyografik Künye Karekodu Oluşturma Etkinliğine Yönelik Öğrenci, Öğretmen ve Okul Kütüphanecisi Görüşleri
Vol. 20 , pp. 196--208
376 views DOI Abstract
2019
Üniversite Öğrencilerinin E-Öğrenmeye Hazır Bulunuşluklarının İncelenmesi: Bartın Üniversitesi Örneği
Vol. 20 , pp. 180--195
232 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,041 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

18.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

79.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.