Indexed in Journament

celal bayar Üniversitesi sağlık bilimleri enstitüsü dergisi

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
22.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #28,614 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
47 Articles
Scores higher than 2.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name celal bayar Üniversitesi sağlık bilimleri enstitüsü dergisi
Abbreviated Name celal bayar Üniversitesi sağlık bilimleri enstitüsü dergisi

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 16.1
Innovation 13.5
Community Impact 8.6
Content Distribution 55.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility — 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 16.1 28.8
Innovation 13.5 31.2
Community Impact 8.6 13.4
Content Distribution 55.6 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (47)

2019
Atletik Performans ve Spor Genetiği
Nurten DİNÇ;Mehmet Hilmi GÖKMEN and
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 127-137
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
Erişkin Hastada Tek Kamera Portu İle Laparoskopik Gastrostomi Postoperatif Morbidite İlişkili Faktörler ve Sonuçların Açık Gastrostomi Tekniği İle Karşılaştırılması
Serhan Derici and
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 81-89
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
Atletik Performans ve Spor Genetiği
Vol. 6 , pp. 127--137
329 views DOI Abstract
2019
TIP FAKÜLTESİ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN MELANOSİTİK NEVUSLER, DERMOSKOPİ VE GÜNEŞTEN KORUNMA İLE İLGİLİ BİLGİ, TUTUM VE GÖRÜŞLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
Zeynep Gizem Kaya İslamoğlu;ABDULLAH DEMİRBAŞ and
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 90-99
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Yüksek Gerçeklikli Hasta Simülatöründe Eğitim: Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Memnuniyeti Ve Öğrenmede Kendine Güvenlerinin Değerlendirilmesi
Elif Karahan;Sevim Çelik;Dilek Yıldım Tank;Fatih Göğüş and
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 106-110
312 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pediatri Hemşirelerinin Çocuk Haklarına Yönelik Tutumlarının Belirlenmesi
DİLEK KÜÇÜK ALEMDAR;GAMZE YILMAZ and
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 121-126
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bir Hastanede Çalışan Hemşirelerin Kültürel Duyarlılıkları ile Kültürel Zekaları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi
Sinan Aslan;Zeynal Kizir and
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 115-120
298 views DOI Abstract
2019
Yüksek Gerçeklikli Hasta Simülatöründe Eğitim: Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Memnuniyeti Ve Öğrenmede Kendine Güvenlerinin Değerlendirilmesi
Vol. 6 , pp. 106--110
295 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bir Hastanede Çalışan Hemşirelerin Kültürel Duyarlılıkları ile Kültürel Zekaları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi
Vol. 6 , pp. 115--120
291 views DOI Abstract
2019
Kapak ve Ön Sayfalar
Editörden Editörden and
Vol. 6 , No. 2
282 views Abstract
2020
Stomalı Hastaların Yaşam Kalitesi Ve Öz Yeterlilik Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi
Zekiye YAŞAR;Hülya ÜSTÜNDAĞ;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 107-115
122 views DOI
2020
Hepatobiliyer Hastalıklarda Tanıya Yönelik Görüntüleme Yöntemlerinden Endoskopik Retrograd Kolanjiopankreatografi ve Manyetik Rezonans Kolanjiopankreatografinin Etkinliğinin Karşılaştırılması
Ahmed Ramiz BAYKAN;Tahir BURAN;Emre GERÇEKER;Hakan YÜCEYAR;Serdar TARHAN;Elmas KASAP;Gökhan PEKİNDİL;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 116-121
47 views DOI
2020
FLORÜRLÜ VERNİK UYGULAMASININ DİŞ SAĞLIĞI TARAMA SONUÇLARI İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
Zeynep AYDIN KILINÇ;Aslınur SIRCAN KÜÇÜKSAYAN;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 71-77
18 views DOI
2020
Kurkumin HEK-293 Hücre Hattında Metotreksat Kaynaklı Hücresel Hasarı Düzenledi
Betül YAZĞAN;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 38-43
57 views DOI
2020
COVID-19’lu Hastalar İçin Mezenkimal Kök Hücre Tedavisi
Özlem DELİBAŞ;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 162-168
19 views DOI
2020
Triple A Sendromlu Hastada Genel Anestezi Yönetimi – Olgu Sunumu
İsmet TOPÇU;İlknur BAHAR BAŞKAVAS;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 186-188
16 views DOI
2020
Çevresel ve Sosyal Faktörler ile Ruh Sağlığı Üzerine Bir İnceleme: Ruh Sağlığı Alanında Sosyal Hizmet Mesleğinin Önemi
Sema GÜZEL;Melek ZUBAROĞLU YANARDAĞ;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 142-150
41 views DOI
2020
KOAH Tanılı Yaşlı Bireylerde Pulmoner Rehabilitasyon
Tahir KESKİN;Zeliha BAŞKURT;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 157-161
13 views DOI
2020
DEXA Çekimlerinde Tc-99m Radyonüklidinin Gama Işınlarının Kemik Mineral Yoğunluğu Ölçümlerine Etkisi: Fantom Çalışması
Nazenin İPEK IŞIKCI;Mustafa DEMİR, PH.D.;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 66-70
108 views DOI
2020
The Relationship Between the Nursing Students’ Attitudes Toward Scientific Research and Their Levels of Academic Self-Efficacy
Demet AKTAŞ;Behire SANÇAR;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 17-22
140 views DOI
Journament Score
22.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #28,614 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

22.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

16.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

13.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

55.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.