advances in skin & wound care | Journament

Journal Ranking

#460 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

advances in skin & wound care

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim sci soc
Short Name adv skin wound care
Abbreviated Name adv skin wound care
ISSN 1538-8654
Aim and Scope
URL https://journals.lww.com/aswcjournal/pages/default.aspx
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (57 total)

2014
a de novo or germline mutation in a family with mucolipidosis iii gamma: implications for molecular diagnosis and genetic counseling
;Renata Voltolini Velho;Taciane Alegra;Fernanda Sperb;Nataniel Floriano Ludwig;Maria Luiza Saraiva-Pereira;Ursula Matte;Ida V.D. Schwartz
Vol. 1 , No. C , pp. 98-102
325 views DOI Abstract
2014
promoting psychological well-being in women with phenylketonuria: pregnancy-related stresses, coping strategies and supports
;Rachel M. Roberts;Tamara Muller;Annabel Sweeney;Drago Bratkovic;Anne Gannoni
Vol. 1 , No. C , pp. 148-157
312 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effectiveness of Arginine Supplementation on Wound Healing in Older Adults in Acute and Chronic Settings: A Systematic Review.
Schneider, Kara L;Yahia, Najat;
311 views DOI Abstract
2019
Aurix Gel Is an Effective Intervention for Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.
Gude, Warren;Hagan, Daniel;Abood, Ferial;Clausen, Peter;
Vol. 32 , No. 9 , pp. 416-426
310 views DOI Abstract
2018
The Effect of Vacuum-Assisted Closure Therapy on Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Wound Biofilms.
Ćirković, Ivana;Jocić, Dario;Božić, Dragana D;Djukić, Slobodanka;Konstantinović, Neda;Radak, Djordje;
Vol. 31 , No. 8 , pp. 361-364
305 views DOI Abstract
2017
Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose/Collagen Dressings: Review of Evidence and Recommendations.
Wu, Stephanie;Applewhite, Andrew J;Niezgoda, Jeffrey;Snyder, Robert;Shah, Jayesh;Cullen, Breda;Schultz, Gregory;Harrison, Janis;Hill, Rosemary;Howell, Melania;Speyrer, Marcus;Utra, Howard;de Leon, Jean;Lee, Wayne;Treadwell, Terry;
Vol. 30 , No. 11S Suppl 1 , pp. S1-S18
295 views DOI Abstract
2019
25-Hydroxyvitamin D Deficiency: Impacting Deep-Wound Infection and Poor Healing Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes.
Smart, Hiske;AlGhareeb, Ahmed Mohamed;Smart, Sally-Anne;
Vol. 32 , No. 7 , pp. 321-328
294 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pressure Injuries in the Pediatric Population: A National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel White Paper.
Delmore, Barbara;Deppisch, Michelle;Sylvia, Cynthia;Luna-Anderson, Crystal;Nie, Ann Marie;
Vol. 32 , No. 9 , pp. 394-408
288 views DOI Abstract
2019
Survey Results from the Gulf Region: NPUAP Changes in Pressure Injury Terminology and Definitions.
Delmore, Barbara;Ayello, Elizabeth A;Smart, Hiske;Tariq, Gulnaz;Sibbald, R Gary;
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 131-138
263 views DOI Abstract
2015
lpin1 deficiency with severe recurrent rhabdomyolysis and persistent elevation of creatine kinase levels due to chromosome 2 maternal isodisomy
;I.A. Meijer;F. Sasarman;C. Maftei;E. Rossignol;M. Vanasse;P. Major;G.A. Mitchell;C. Brunel-Guitton
Vol. 5 , No. C , pp. 85-88
259 views DOI Abstract
View All 57 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.