Indexed in Journament

bmc medicine

ISSN 1741-7015· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,612 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
36 Articles
Scores higher than 87.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name bmc med
Abbreviated Name bmc medicine
ISSN 1741-7015
URL http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmed

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for bmc medicine
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 55.6 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 11.4 4.2
Content Distribution 60.3 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (36)

2019
The effect of a lifestyle intervention in obese pregnant women on gestational metabolic profiles: findings from the UK Pregnancies Better Eating and Activity Trial (UPBEAT) randomised controlled trial
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
641 views Abstract
2018
Trends in, and factors associated with, HIV infection amongst tuberculosis patients in the era of anti-retroviral therapy: a retrospective study in England, Wales and Northern Ireland
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
600 views Abstract
2018
Large-scale external validation and comparison of prognostic models: an application to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 1-13
561 views Abstract
2019
Travel time to health facilities in areas of outbreak potential: maps for guiding local preparedness and response.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 232
549 views DOI Abstract
2019
The cost of diagnostic uncertainty: a prospective economic analysis of febrile children attending an NHS emergency department.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 48
530 views DOI Abstract
2018
Correction to: Frailty, nutrition-related parameters, and mortality across the adult age spectrum
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 1-3
525 views Abstract
2020
Drug-resistant enteric fever worldwide, 1990 to 2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1
476 views DOI Abstract
2018
Practice variation in the use of tests in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 16 million tests performed over 3.3 million patient years in 2015/16
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
448 views Abstract
2005
The impact of glucose-insulin-potassium infusion in acute myocardial infarction on infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction [ISRCTN56720616]
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 9-
431 views Abstract
2020
"The post-COVID era": challenges in the treatment of substance use disorder (SUD) after the pandemic.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 241
323 views DOI Abstract
2020
The complex neurobiology of resilient functioning after childhood maltreatment.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 32
419 views DOI Abstract
2020
Drug-resistant enteric fever worldwide, 1990 to 2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1
476 views DOI Abstract
2019
Stigma in health facilities: why it matters and how we can change it
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 1-15
280 views Abstract
2019
Travel time to health facilities in areas of outbreak potential: maps for guiding local preparedness and response.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 232
549 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development and validation of a novel MR imaging predictor of response to induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: a randomized controlled trial substudy (NCT01245959).
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 190
294 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,612 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

11.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

60.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.