Stigma in health facilities: why it matters and how we can change it
Clicks: 254
ID: 101000
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
79.7
/100
250 views
203 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Abstract Stigma in health facilities undermines diagnosis, treatment, and successful health outcomes. Addressing stigma is fundamental to delivering quality healthcare and achieving optimal health. This correspondence article seeks to assess how developments over the past 5 years have contributed to the state of programmatic knowledge—both approaches and methods—regarding interventions to reduce stigma in health facilities, and explores the potential to concurrently address multiple health condition stigmas. It is supported by findings from a systematic review of published articles indexed in PubMed, Psychinfo and Web of Science, and in the United States Agency for International Development’s Development Experience Clearinghouse, which was conducted in February 2018 and restricted to the past 5 years. Forty-two studies met inclusion criteria and provided insight on interventions to reduce HIV, mental illness, or substance abuse stigma. Multiple common approaches to address stigma in health facilities emerged, which were implemented in a variety of ways. The literature search identified key gaps including a dearth of stigma reduction interventions in health facilities that focus on tuberculosis, diabetes, leprosy, or cancer; target multiple cadres of staff or multiple ecological levels; leverage interactive technology; or address stigma experienced by health workers. Preliminary results from ongoing innovative responses to these gaps are also described. The current evidence base of stigma reduction in health facilities provides a solid foundation to develop and implement interventions. However, gaps exist and merit further work. Future investment in health facility stigma reduction should prioritize the involvement of clients living with the stigmatized condition or behavior and health workers living with stigmatized conditions and should address both individual and structural level stigma.
| Reference Key |
nyblade2019stigmabmc
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Nyblade, Laura;Stockton, Melissa A.;Giger, Kayla;Bond, Virginia;Ekstrand, Maria L.;Lean, Roger Mc;Mitchell, Ellen M. H.;Nelson, La Ron E.;Sapag, Jaime C.;Siraprapasiri, Taweesap;Turan, Janet;Wouters, Edwin; |
| Journal | bmc medicine |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Microbiology
Therapeutics. Pharmacology
Infectious and parasitic diseases
Medicine
Chemical technology
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Technology
Science (General)
Science
Aquaculture. Fisheries. Angling
physics
neurosciences. biological psychiatry. neuropsychiatry
applied optics. photonics
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.