Indexed in Journament

la revue de medecine interne

ISSN 1768-3122· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,898 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
11 Articles
Scores higher than 62.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name rev med interne
Abbreviated Name rev med interne
ISSN 1768-3122

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 72.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for la revue de medecine interne
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.7 13.4
Content Distribution 72.1 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (11)

2017
[Discontinuation or tapering strategies of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis in remission]
Vol. 38 , No. 4 , pp. -
407 views Abstract
2019
[Artificial intelligence: Guidelines for internists].
367 views DOI Abstract
2020
[Assessment of a newly-implemented blended teaching of intensive care and emergency medicine at Paris-Diderot University].
Vol. 41 , No. 6 , pp. 368-374
353 views DOI Abstract
2010
Traitement du purpura thrombopénique immunologique : étude rétrospective de 40 patients
Vol. 31 , No. 5 , pp. 337-344
351 views DOI Abstract
2010
[Treatment of immune thrombocytopenia: a retrospective study of 40 patients]
Vol. 31 , No. 5 , pp. -
341 views Abstract
2010
Balance Th17/Treg au cours de la maladie de Horton et la Pseudopolyarthrite rhizomélique : une nouvelle cible thérapeutique ?
Vol. 31 , pp. S358-
264 views DOI
1990
Polychondrite atrophiante: des arguments en faveur d'une véritable origine auto-immune
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. S134-
239 views DOI
2013
Capillaroscopie et maladie de Rendu Osler : étude prospective de 44 patients
Vol. 34 , pp. A69-A70
222 views DOI
2013
Étude rétrospective des hypogammaglobulinémies secondaires de l’adulte pendant 6mois au CHU de Dijon : étiologies, conséquences infectieuses et pratiques vaccinales
Vol. 34 , pp. A27-A28
166 views DOI
1990
Mastocytes médullaires et affections associées
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. S151-
133 views DOI
2020
[Assessment of a newly-implemented blended teaching of intensive care and emergency medicine at Paris-Diderot University].
Vol. 41 , No. 6 , pp. 368-374
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Artificial intelligence: Guidelines for internists].
367 views DOI Abstract
2017
[Discontinuation or tapering strategies of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis in remission]
Vol. 38 , No. 4 , pp. -
407 views Abstract
2013
Capillaroscopie et maladie de Rendu Osler : étude prospective de 44 patients
Vol. 34 , pp. A69-A70
222 views DOI
2013
Étude rétrospective des hypogammaglobulinémies secondaires de l’adulte pendant 6mois au CHU de Dijon : étiologies, conséquences infectieuses et pratiques vaccinales
Vol. 34 , pp. A27-A28
166 views DOI
2010
Balance Th17/Treg au cours de la maladie de Horton et la Pseudopolyarthrite rhizomélique : une nouvelle cible thérapeutique ?
Vol. 31 , pp. S358-
264 views DOI
2010
Traitement du purpura thrombopénique immunologique : étude rétrospective de 40 patients
Vol. 31 , No. 5 , pp. 337-344
351 views DOI Abstract
2010
[Treatment of immune thrombocytopenia: a retrospective study of 40 patients]
Vol. 31 , No. 5 , pp. -
341 views Abstract
1998
Érythème noueux révélant une leucémie myélomonocytaire chronique: deux observations
Vol. 19 , No. 11 , pp. 838-839
103 views DOI
1990
Mastocytes médullaires et affections associées
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. S151-
133 views DOI
Journament Score
37.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,898 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

72.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.