[Assessment of a newly-implemented blended teaching of intensive care and emergency medicine at Paris-Diderot University].
Clicks: 371
ID: 206337
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
80.6
/100
371 views
260 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #3 of 11 articles by views in la revue de medecine interne
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Blended-learning methods could be a response to student nonattendance. Non-compulsory teaching combining e-learning/interactive face-to-face sessions has been implemented at Paris-Diderot Medical School for the teaching of intensive care and emergency medicine during the 2018/2019 university period. The aim of the study was to assess this newly-implemented blended teaching.Questionnaire submitted to the 388 DFASM3 medical students present at the faculty exam of intensive care/emergency medicine. Attendance at a teaching modality was defined by the follow-up of more than half of this teaching modality. Correlations between attendance at e-learning and/or interactive face-to-face sessions, and grade were performed.A total of 358/388 (92%) students participated in this survey. A quarter of the students (88/321 - 25%) reported they usually attended at traditional lectures. Regarding blended-learning, 210/317 (67%) students reported having attended at e-learning courses and 84/321 (27%) attended at interactive face-to-face sessions. The distribution of students according to their attendance at e-learning and/or interactive face-to-face sessions was significantly different (P<0.01). There was a significant correlation (P<0.001) between attendance at e-learning and grade obtained at the faculty exam. Nevertheless, this correlation was also found for these students in another course taught traditionally. Overall, 309/315 (98%) students were satisfied with the blended teaching, 297/318 (93%) wanted its extent to the whole medical school's curriculum.The use of combined learning methods reached more students than traditional teachings and allowed the University to focus on its role of knowledge transfer.
| Reference Key |
vodovar2020assessmentla
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Vodovar, D;Ricard, J D;Zafrani, L;Weiss, E;Desrentes, E;Roux, D; |
| Journal | la revue de medecine interne |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
S0248-8663(20)30009-6
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.