Indexed in Journament

american journal of clinical oncology

ISSN 1537-453X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,481 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
17 Articles
Scores higher than 57.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name am j clin oncol
Abbreviated Name am j clin oncol
ISSN 1537-453X
URL http://journals.lww.com/amjclinicaloncology/pages/default.aspx

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for american journal of clinical oncology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 55.6 24.4
Innovation 36.0 25.7
Community Impact 9.3 5.8
Content Distribution 74.4 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2017
a comparative study of sorafenib and metronomic chemotherapy for barcelona clinic liver cancer-stage c hepatocellular carcinoma with poor liver function
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 128-137
534 views DOI Abstract
2015
static and dynamic prognostic factors for hepatitis-b-related acute-on-chronic liver failure
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 232-241
488 views DOI Abstract
2016
efficacy of switching from adefovir to tenofovir in chronic hepatitis b patients who exhibit suboptimal responses to adefovir-based combination rescue therapy due to resistance to nucleoside analogues (satis study)
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. 443-449
404 views DOI Abstract
2019
Long-Term Vitamin K Antagonists and Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
392 views DOI Abstract
2017
efficacy of tenofovir-based rescue therapy for chronic hepatitis b patients with resistance to lamivudine and entecavir
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 230-238
385 views DOI Abstract
2016
comparison of the clinical outcomes between antiviral-naïve patients treated with entecavir and lamivudine-resistant patients receiving adefovir add-on lamivudine combination treatment
Vol. 22 , No. 3 , pp. 350-358
385 views DOI Abstract
2016
comparison of tenofovir plus lamivudine versus tenofovir monotherapy in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis b
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 152-159
351 views DOI Abstract
2016
emergency endoscopic variceal ligation in cirrhotic patients with blood clots in the stomach but no active bleeding or stigmata increases the risk of rebleeding
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. 466-476
342 views DOI Abstract
2014
predictors of spontaneous viral clearance and outcomes of acute hepatitis c infection
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. 368-375
328 views DOI Abstract
2017
Definitive Chemoradiation With Full-dose Gemcitabine for Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: Efficacy of Involved-Field Radiotherapy.
Vol. 40 , No. 5 , pp. 517-522
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Long-Term Vitamin K Antagonists and Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
392 views DOI Abstract
2017
efficacy of tenofovir-based rescue therapy for chronic hepatitis b patients with resistance to lamivudine and entecavir
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 230-238
385 views DOI Abstract
2017
hepatogastric fistula as a rare complication of pyogenic liver abscess
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 87-90
235 views DOI Abstract
2017
a comparative study of sorafenib and metronomic chemotherapy for barcelona clinic liver cancer-stage c hepatocellular carcinoma with poor liver function
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 128-137
534 views DOI Abstract
2017
Definitive Chemoradiation With Full-dose Gemcitabine for Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: Efficacy of Involved-Field Radiotherapy.
Vol. 40 , No. 5 , pp. 517-522
327 views DOI Abstract
2016
comparison of the clinical outcomes between antiviral-naïve patients treated with entecavir and lamivudine-resistant patients receiving adefovir add-on lamivudine combination treatment
Vol. 22 , No. 3 , pp. 350-358
385 views DOI Abstract
2016
emergency endoscopic variceal ligation in cirrhotic patients with blood clots in the stomach but no active bleeding or stigmata increases the risk of rebleeding
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. 466-476
342 views DOI Abstract
2016
portal biliopathy treated with endoscopic biliary stenting
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 172-176
215 views DOI Abstract
2016
a case of portal hypertension by presumed as plexiform neurofibroma at the hepatic hilum
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 276-280
241 views DOI Abstract
2016
efficacy of switching from adefovir to tenofovir in chronic hepatitis b patients who exhibit suboptimal responses to adefovir-based combination rescue therapy due to resistance to nucleoside analogues (satis study)
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. 443-449
404 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,481 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

34.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

36.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

74.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.