american journal of clinical oncology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#739 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

american journal of clinical oncology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name am j clin oncol
Abbreviated Name am j clin oncol
ISSN 1537-453X
Aim and Scope
URL http://journals.lww.com/amjclinicaloncology/pages/default.aspx
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2017
a comparative study of sorafenib and metronomic chemotherapy for barcelona clinic liver cancer-stage c hepatocellular carcinoma with poor liver function
;Hyun Yang;Hyun Young Woo;Soon Kyu Lee;Ji Won Han;Bohyun Jang;Hee Chul Nam;Hae Lim Lee;Sung Won Lee;Do Seon Song;Myeong Jun Song;Jung Suk Oh;Ho Jong Chun;Jeong Won Jang;Angelo Lozada;Si Hyun Bae;Jong Young Choi;Seung Kew Yoon
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 128-137
468 views DOI Abstract
2015
static and dynamic prognostic factors for hepatitis-b-related acute-on-chronic liver failure
;Jung Min Ha;Won Sohn;Ju Yeon Cho;Jeung Hui Pyo;Kyu Choi;Dong Hyun Sinn;Geum-Youn Gwak;Moon Seok Choi;Joon Hyeok Lee;Kwang Chul Koh;Seung Woon Paik;Byung Chul Yoo;Yong-Han Paik
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 232-241
437 views DOI Abstract
2017
efficacy of tenofovir-based rescue therapy for chronic hepatitis b patients with resistance to lamivudine and entecavir
;Hee-Jeong Jeon;Seok Won Jung;Neung Hwa Park;Yujin Yang;Jin-Hee Noh;Jae-Sung Ahn;Hyung Rae Kim;Jae Ho Lee;Jung Woo Shin
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 230-238
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Long-Term Vitamin K Antagonists and Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Shurrab, Mohammed;Quinn, Kieran L;Kitchlu, Abhijat;Jackevicius, Cynthia A;Ko, Dennis T;
321 views DOI Abstract
2016
comparison of the clinical outcomes between antiviral-naïve patients treated with entecavir and lamivudine-resistant patients receiving adefovir add-on lamivudine combination treatment
;Hong Joo Kim;Soo Kyung Park;Hyo Joon Yang;Yoon Suk Jung;Jung Ho Park;Dong Il Park;Yong Kyun Cho;Chong Il Sohn;Woo Kyu Jeon;Byung Ik Kim;Kyu Yong Choi
Vol. 22 , No. 3 , pp. 350-358
318 views DOI Abstract
2016
efficacy of switching from adefovir to tenofovir in chronic hepatitis b patients who exhibit suboptimal responses to adefovir-based combination rescue therapy due to resistance to nucleoside analogues (satis study)
;Hye Won Lee;Jun Yong Park;Beom Kyung Kim;Moon Young Kim;Jung Il Lee;Young Suk Kim;Ki Tae Yoon;Kwang-Hyub Han;Sang Hoon Ahn
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. 443-449
306 views DOI Abstract
2016
comparison of tenofovir plus lamivudine versus tenofovir monotherapy in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis b
;Chan Ho Park;Seok Won Jung;Jung Woo Shin;Mi Ae Bae;Yoon Im Lee;Yong Tae Park;Hwa Sik Chung;Neung Hwa Park
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 152-159
302 views DOI Abstract
2016
emergency endoscopic variceal ligation in cirrhotic patients with blood clots in the stomach but no active bleeding or stigmata increases the risk of rebleeding
;Su Jin Kim;Cheol Woong Choi;Dae Hwan Kang;Hyung Wook Kim;Su Bum Park;Young Mi Hong;Ki Tae Yoon;Mong Cho;Hyung Seok Nam;SM Bakhtiar UI Islam
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. 466-476
295 views DOI Abstract
2017
Definitive Chemoradiation With Full-dose Gemcitabine for Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: Efficacy of Involved-Field Radiotherapy.
Zhou, Jessica;Fang, Charles X;Shen, Jincheng;Schipper, Matthew J;Zalupski, Mark M;Minter, Rebecca M;Simeone, Diane M;Hart, Deanna;Eagle, Taylor;Kimmel, Grace W;Vainshtein, Jeffrey;Lawrence, Theodore S;Feng, Mary;
Vol. 40 , No. 5 , pp. 517-522
279 views DOI Abstract
2014
predictors of spontaneous viral clearance and outcomes of acute hepatitis c infection
;Yoo-Kyung Cho;Young Nam Kim;Byung-Cheol Song
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. 368-375
261 views DOI Abstract
View All 17 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.