the western journal of emergency medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#550 / 33,940
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

the western journal of emergency medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name west j emerg med
Abbreviated Name west j emerg med
ISSN 1936-9018
Aim and Scope
URL http://escholarship.org/uc/uciem_westjem
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (26 total)

2015
factors affecting invasive management after unplanned extubation in an intensive care unit
;A Lan Lee;Chi Ryang Chung;Jeong Hoon Yang;Kyeongman Jeon;Chi-Min Park;Gee Young Suh
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 164-170
488 views DOI Abstract
2020
2019-nCoV: The Identify-Isolate-Inform (3I) Tool Applied to a Novel Emerging Coronavirus.
Koenig, Kristi L;Beÿ, Christian K;McDonald, Eric C;
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 184-190
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
When the Learner Is the Expert: A Simulation-Based Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Faculty.
Binstadt, Emily S;Dahms, Rachel A;Carlson, Amanda J;Hegarty, Cullen B;Nelson, Jessie G;
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 141-144
351 views DOI Abstract
2017
Security, Violent Events, and Anticipated Surge Capabilities of Emergency Departments in Washington State.
Weyand, Jonathan S;Junck, Emily;Kang, Christopher S;Heiner, Jason D;
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 466-473
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
Thromboembolic Risk of 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate versus Fresh Frozen Plasma for Urgent Warfarin Reversal in the Emergency Department.
Maguire, Michelle;Fuh, Lanting;Goldstein, Joshua N;Marshall, Ariela L;Levine, Michael;Howell, Melissa L;Parry, Blair A;Rosovsky, Rachel;Hayes, Bryan D;
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. 619-625
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluating a Novel Simulation Course for Prehospital Provider Resuscitation Training in Botswana.
Kosoko, Adeola A;Glomb, Nicolaus W;Laba, Bushe;Galapi, Cafen;Shah, Manish I;Rus, Marideth C;Doughty, Cara B;
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 731-739
343 views DOI Abstract
2016
the prevalence and significance of overt disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients with septic shock in the emergency department according to the third international consensus definition
;Byuk Sung Ko;Hyun Young Cho;Seung Mok Ryoo;Myung Chun Kim;Woong Jung;Sung Hyuk Park;Chang Min Lee;Won Young Kim
Vol. 31 , No. 4 , pp. 334-341
321 views DOI Abstract
2019
How Well Does the Standardized Video Interview Score Correlate with Traditional Interview Performance?
Chung, Arlene S;Shah, Kaushal H;Bond, Michael;Ardolic, Brahim;Husain, Abbas;Li, Ida;Cygan, Lukasz;Caputo, William;Shoenberger, Jan;van Dermark, Jeff;Bronner, Jonathan;Weizberg, Moshe;
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 726-730
318 views DOI Abstract
2017
rapid response systems reduce in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest: a pilot study and motivation for a nationwide survey
;Yeonhee Park;Jong-Joon Ahn;Byung Ju Kang;Young Seok Lee;Sang-Ook Ha;Jin-Soo Min;Woo-Hyun Cho;Se-Hee Na;Dong-Hyun Lee;Seung-Yong Park;Goo-Hyeon Hong;Hyun-Jung Kim;Sangwoo Shim;Jung-Hyun Kim;Seok-Jeong Lee;So-Young Park;Jae Young Moon
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 231-239
307 views DOI Abstract
2016
the future of research on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ecmo)
;Ji Young Lee
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 73-75
275 views DOI
View All 26 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.