Indexed in Journament

the western journal of emergency medicine

ISSN 1936-9018· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,148 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
26 Articles
Scores higher than 41.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name west j emerg med
Abbreviated Name west j emerg med
ISSN 1936-9018
URL http://escholarship.org/uc/uciem_westjem

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for the western journal of emergency medicine
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 9.3 4.2
Content Distribution 73.6 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (26)

2015
factors affecting invasive management after unplanned extubation in an intensive care unit
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 164-170
535 views DOI Abstract
2020
2019-nCoV: The Identify-Isolate-Inform (3I) Tool Applied to a Novel Emerging Coronavirus.
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 184-190
419 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluating a Novel Simulation Course for Prehospital Provider Resuscitation Training in Botswana.
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 731-739
409 views DOI Abstract
2019
When the Learner Is the Expert: A Simulation-Based Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Faculty.
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 141-144
402 views DOI Abstract
2017
Security, Violent Events, and Anticipated Surge Capabilities of Emergency Departments in Washington State.
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 466-473
397 views DOI Abstract
2019
Thromboembolic Risk of 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate versus Fresh Frozen Plasma for Urgent Warfarin Reversal in the Emergency Department.
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. 619-625
385 views DOI Abstract
2016
the prevalence and significance of overt disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients with septic shock in the emergency department according to the third international consensus definition
Vol. 31 , No. 4 , pp. 334-341
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
How Well Does the Standardized Video Interview Score Correlate with Traditional Interview Performance?
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 726-730
373 views DOI Abstract
2017
rapid response systems reduce in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest: a pilot study and motivation for a nationwide survey
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 231-239
371 views DOI Abstract
2017
effect of renin-angiotensin system blockage in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective case control study
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 154-163
329 views DOI Abstract
2020
2019-nCoV: The Identify-Isolate-Inform (3I) Tool Applied to a Novel Emerging Coronavirus.
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 184-190
419 views DOI Abstract
2019
When the Learner Is the Expert: A Simulation-Based Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Faculty.
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 141-144
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
How Well Does the Standardized Video Interview Score Correlate with Traditional Interview Performance?
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 726-730
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluating a Novel Simulation Course for Prehospital Provider Resuscitation Training in Botswana.
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 731-739
409 views DOI Abstract
2019
Thromboembolic Risk of 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate versus Fresh Frozen Plasma for Urgent Warfarin Reversal in the Emergency Department.
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. 619-625
385 views DOI Abstract
2017
outbreak of imipenemase-1-producing carbapenem-resistant in an intensive care unit
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 29-38
208 views DOI Abstract
2017
the role of oliguria and the absence of fluid administration and balance information in illness severity scores
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 106-123
108 views DOI Abstract
2017
extensive and progressive cerebral infarction after infection
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 211-217
234 views DOI Abstract
2017
effect of renin-angiotensin system blockage in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective case control study
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 154-163
329 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
30.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,148 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

30.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.