Indexed in Journament

the western journal of emergency medicine

ISSN 1936-9018· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.4 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #6,740 of 33,995 indexed journals
26 Articles
Accessibility 35
Engagement 31
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name west j emerg med
Abbreviated Name west j emerg med
ISSN 1936-9018
URL http://escholarship.org/uc/uciem_westjem

Publications Per Year

Articles (26)

2015
factors affecting invasive management after unplanned extubation in an intensive care unit
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 164-170
523 views DOI Abstract
2020
2019-nCoV: The Identify-Isolate-Inform (3I) Tool Applied to a Novel Emerging Coronavirus.
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 184-190
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluating a Novel Simulation Course for Prehospital Provider Resuscitation Training in Botswana.
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 731-739
400 views DOI Abstract
2019
When the Learner Is the Expert: A Simulation-Based Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Faculty.
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 141-144
394 views DOI Abstract
2017
Security, Violent Events, and Anticipated Surge Capabilities of Emergency Departments in Washington State.
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 466-473
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
Thromboembolic Risk of 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate versus Fresh Frozen Plasma for Urgent Warfarin Reversal in the Emergency Department.
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. 619-625
375 views DOI Abstract
2016
the prevalence and significance of overt disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients with septic shock in the emergency department according to the third international consensus definition
Vol. 31 , No. 4 , pp. 334-341
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
How Well Does the Standardized Video Interview Score Correlate with Traditional Interview Performance?
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 726-730
356 views DOI Abstract
2017
rapid response systems reduce in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest: a pilot study and motivation for a nationwide survey
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 231-239
354 views DOI Abstract
2017
effect of renin-angiotensin system blockage in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective case control study
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 154-163
320 views DOI Abstract
2020
2019-nCoV: The Identify-Isolate-Inform (3I) Tool Applied to a Novel Emerging Coronavirus.
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 184-190
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
When the Learner Is the Expert: A Simulation-Based Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Faculty.
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 141-144
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
How Well Does the Standardized Video Interview Score Correlate with Traditional Interview Performance?
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 726-730
356 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluating a Novel Simulation Course for Prehospital Provider Resuscitation Training in Botswana.
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 731-739
400 views DOI Abstract
2019
Thromboembolic Risk of 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate versus Fresh Frozen Plasma for Urgent Warfarin Reversal in the Emergency Department.
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. 619-625
375 views DOI Abstract
2017
outbreak of imipenemase-1-producing carbapenem-resistant in an intensive care unit
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 29-38
199 views DOI Abstract
2017
the role of oliguria and the absence of fluid administration and balance information in illness severity scores
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 106-123
100 views DOI Abstract
2017
extensive and progressive cerebral infarction after infection
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 211-217
227 views DOI Abstract
2017
effect of renin-angiotensin system blockage in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective case control study
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 154-163
320 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
41.4/100 · Below Average
Ranked #6,740 of 33,995

Overall Quality Score

41.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.