Indexed in Journament

heart rhythm

ISSN 1556-3871· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,101 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
25 Articles
Scores higher than 41.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name heart rhythm
Abbreviated Name heart rhythm
ISSN 1556-3871
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/heart-rhythm

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 12.1
Content Distribution 70.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for heart rhythm
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 12.1 13.4
Content Distribution 70.2 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (25)

2017
2017 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the evaluation and management of patients with syncope
513 views DOI
2019
Difficulties with Invasive Risk Stratification Performed Under Anesthesia in Pediatric Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome.
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Thromboembolic, Bleeding, and Mortality Risks among Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy versus Oral Anticoagulants: A Population-Based Study.
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
S wave in ECG lead V6 predicts poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and long-term outcome.
410 views DOI Abstract
2020
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 and inherited arrhythmia syndromes.
393 views DOI Abstract
2020
QT prolongation, torsades de pointes, and sudden death with short courses of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine as used in COVID-19: A systematic review.
356 views DOI Abstract
2018
particle sources and transport in stratified nordic coastal seas in the anthropocene
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. -
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cardiac resynchronization therapy by left bundle branch area pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block.
326 views DOI Abstract
2020
QT prolongation, torsades de pointes, and sudden death with short courses of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine as used in COVID-19: A systematic review.
356 views DOI Abstract
2020
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 and inherited arrhythmia syndromes.
393 views DOI Abstract
2019
S wave in ECG lead V6 predicts poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and long-term outcome.
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cardiac resynchronization therapy by left bundle branch area pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block.
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
Difficulties with Invasive Risk Stratification Performed Under Anesthesia in Pediatric Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome.
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Thromboembolic, Bleeding, and Mortality Risks among Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy versus Oral Anticoagulants: A Population-Based Study.
427 views DOI Abstract
2018
scales of seafloor sediment resuspension in the northern gulf of mexico
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. -
204 views DOI Abstract
2018
drinking water salinity associated health crisis in coastal bangladesh
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. -
212 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,101 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

34.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.