current opinion in anaesthesiology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#543 / 33,954
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

current opinion in anaesthesiology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name curr opin anaesthesiol
Abbreviated Name curr opin anaesthesiol
ISSN 1473-6500
Aim and Scope
URL https://journals.lww.com/co-anesthesiology/pages/default.aspx
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (26 total)

2019
Primer on machine learning: utilization of large data set analyses to individualize pain management.
Rashidi, Parisa;Edwards, David A;Tighe, Patrick J;
330 views DOI Abstract
2016
ultrasound and stethoscope as tools in medical education and practice: considerations for the archives
;Fakoya FA;du Plessis M;Gbenimacho IB
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 381-387
303 views Abstract
2020
nursing students learn to handle stress and to prioritize in a complex context during workplace learning in acute internal medicine care – an ethnographic study
;Hägg-Martinell A;Hult H;Henriksson P;Kiessling A
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 21-30
297 views Abstract
2017
contextualizing the relevance of basic sciences: small-group simulation with debrief for first- and second-year medical students in an integrated curriculum
;Ginzburg SB;Brenner J;Cassara M;Kwiatkowski T;Willey JM
Vol. Volume 8 , pp. 79-84
296 views Abstract
2014
evidence-based practice training for health professionals in the philippines
;Dizon JM;Dizon RJ;Regino J;Gabriel A
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 89-94
294 views Abstract
2019
Nonoperating room anesthesia education: preparing our residents for the future.
Boggs, Steven D;Luedi, Markus M;
Vol. 32 , No. 4 , pp. 490-497
277 views DOI Abstract
2016
evaluation of preceptors and skills achievement by clinical pharmacy clerkship students during their clinical rotations at university of gondar, ethiopia
;Belachew SA;Abegaz TM;Bhagavathula AS;Getachew H;Tefera YG
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 187-196
265 views Abstract
2014
training medical students in the social determinants of health: the health scholars program at puentes de salud
;O’Brien MJ;Garl;JM;Murphy KM;Shuman SJ;Whitaker RC;Larson SC
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 307-314
256 views Abstract
2018
improving feedback by using first-person video during the emergency medicine clerkship
;Hoonpongsimanont W;Feldman M;Bove N;Sahota PK;Velarde I;Anderson CL;Wiechmann W
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 559-565
252 views Abstract
2019
Anesthetic management of complex spine surgery in adult patients: a review based on outcome evidence.
Alboog, Abdulrahman;Bae, Sandy;Chui, Jason;
Vol. 32 , No. 5 , pp. 600-608
247 views DOI Abstract
View All 26 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.